KyleBrown

Time for a price increase!

I love these new bodies.

First we'll start with pics of my beastly temp sub. Pure sex. Single 6" port, probably tuned around 33. Moves a good bit of air and is really impressive for a single 12. Next. Making runs of wire for the front stage. 3 run of 12 gauge per door plus 2 runs of 16 gauge. I may not use all of it but it will give me good wiring options. Getting wood with my dude Ryan( no homo.) Getting the base of the superstock build ready. Getting the sides in. Three 18s is going to be tight. Lots fiberglassing will be going down. And another 180$ trip to the hardware store..

They looked confused.

That's so sick looking. Stupid usaci rules can't have anything larger than an 8" driver forward of the B pillar .

It's fighting me every bit of the way.

SP4 doesn't come to mind when I think about "Monster" sub. The team Fi seems beefy but not monster. I'd look into a SHD, TRF motored subs, TC5200/5400 motored subs, Everest sound labs has a stupid 18 out. The IA warden looks pretty massive for a 3" coiled motor.

I go to a whole different driver selection. If you're really wanting to dip into the lows. Not just "play" them. My ideas will probably blow your budget though. HAT does seem a tad over priced. Honestly, you can build yourself a nice three way front stage with a Levi. I wish mine wouldn't have taken dump. Serious amount of power, really low noise floor and more crossover options than you can shake a stick at. If you're really looking into dipping into the lows, I'll suggest a custom built driver. I'm waiting to see how much coils are, but I've got a 13w7 motor I'm looking to build and maybe more if it turns out good. I feel it's a great starting point.

More updates, Started cleaning the wires a little and my ADHD kicked in so I moved on to deadener. I have close to five sheets on the floor(single layer) One little patch left to cover up. I'm getting my motivation back. I just hate this cold ass weather. Basshead problems. Just a few little patches left. One big patch on the passenger side. This the RCA's, LC-1, parking brake wire, buck up camera switch wire and volt meter jumpers. Most of this will hook up through the center console. Last thing I need to truly decide on is my front stage. Then I'll throw the carpet back in.

Well. I planned on selling this piece of shit, but tax returns aren't looking favorable. So today, I had to cut a couple bolts to get the front seats out. Got some wires prepped for my volt meter. Got the floor prepped for the most part. Going to be laying some stinger roadkill expert and alpha damn in certain places. Going to group all the wires together accordingly. I've also fixed the 4wd, so that's cool. Right now, I'm smart charging each battery independently. Going to be starting the wall soon. Brand new front actuator. Flexing it a little. One seat out. I love a rats nest. One of the bolts I had to cut out.

Dude takes all the plates in the gym to finish his workout. Damn dude.

That's stupid. At the levels he should be at, I highly doubt you'll hear the distortion you need to hear. Maybe if you're trying to setup a single 12 on 2k. His electrical is not even close to what it should be. I had 4 D3100s and a 370a alt on one NS-1. I still after a full song or two, dropped to mid 12s. Box looks great. Once it gets sorted out, he should be able to do 57-58

interesting.

I'll agree with this too. Tuned in for the final result. Hope it turns out well.

This seems like a good place for this.

It will work with an X coil or Zv3 coils. You cannot use a Zv4 coil with those parts in the Zv3 motor. As far as I know. I would keep the parts you have now.

Going three way gives you a lot more options. You can dial in the exact sound you want. Less compromises. My next stage will be active 3way. A nice mid range driver will go a long way. I'm not a big fan mid range, so I can get away with less than most because it's what I like. You have the perfect amp to go three way active cheezy.

Have you considered going three way? Lots of mid bass can be had from Anarchy mids.

Look man, there's no way possible for any of us on here to do any sort of real testing on an amplifier. Testing an amp with a resistor bank still isn't even good for a general idea. These tests are %100 worthless.

Yea, 10k with a clipped to shit wave. So that's hardly overwriting the previous results.

Going through I don't think they meant you were bashing the company/nick but others. I don't see how they're being sarcastic. Impious, tirefryr and shizzzon were trying to explain. M5 was the only one being sarcastic and was only doing it because tenacious is annoying and ignorant. I don't understand why you guys don't listen to these guys... Zero tact and constantly talking in circles rather than being direct. Discredits whatever they see fit without truly explaining why everyone else should discredit. They act as though they're %100 right, but fail to fully disclose why they are correct and someone else is incorrect. They scream tolerances and calibrations yet never give any real numbers. They never ask what the given tools tolerances are and if they have been calibrated or when the last time they were calibrated. Just because you have technical training behind you and some real world exercise, doesn't mean you have the right to discredit everyone else. It's easy to sit behind a computer and seem all so intelligent. There's a common factor of why a lot of people don't like this forum. Maybe you should go and seek some education and then you might understand just how much money, time, equipment, etc... goes into testing, measuring, certifying etc. Right now it seems that all these guys are "talking circles rather then being direct" but you clearly do not understand this subject. Once you go out and find the necessary knowledge, then you will realize how right these few guys are. Until then, argue on and have fun!! I more than understand this subject. This shit is simple, yet you tech team dick riders and "tech team" want to make this complicated. Maybe you should take some laxative and the rest of the tech team to get rid of the bull shit you guys are full of. I swear you guys could ruin a wet dream because one of her nails was .05mm too long. Yet, every post you make shows how little you do understand and your inability to comprehend. If you understood what was happening and comprehended what has actually been discussed and challenged here, you would never have posted. You keep stating people are typing in circles, yet the ones whom keep complaining about it are in fact the ones doing it. Everything has been explained to you; you just won't allow yourself to understand it as you would have to admit to yourself that you don't really know as much as you think you do. Don't get upset, this happens to us all. How about taking a step back, and just thinking, these guys ARE right and why they are. The simple fact is, the man who did the "testing" and posted this information is simply a hobbyist. His results can not be relied on, yet many people whom don't understand this WILL rely on his "testing" simply because they don't know any better. As long as there are uncontrollable variables, the "testing" is pointless. If ANY of us conducted this "testing" in a similar matter, the "tests" would also be invalid. If these "tests" were being conducted by a lab, by a professional, all testing parameters would have laid out, explained, and discussed in length before any testing had begun. Than and only then could the results be relied upon and only after many amplifiers had been tested not just one or ten. What you idiots don't understand, is I understand what you guys are saying. It's not I'm trying to understand swahili. I've not claimed I know everything, I've not claimed you guys are wrong, I've not claimed Taylor is %100 right. Most of the information requested is readily available. Even if you're testing in a lab, there can still be unforeseen variables. Slight change in humidity, maybe the temperature dropped two degrees. First test netted you 9,620 watts, then all of a sudden your next test nets 9,800. This test wasn't to be accurate down to a millionth. Just because it didn't go directly over second base, doesn't mean it's a foul ball or of the park. CEA testing is about as useless as tits on a hog.

You need to start coming off more pics or stop posting.

Going through I don't think they meant you were bashing the company/nick but others. I don't see how they're being sarcastic. Impious, tirefryr and shizzzon were trying to explain. M5 was the only one being sarcastic and was only doing it because tenacious is annoying and ignorant. I don't understand why you guys don't listen to these guys... Zero tact and constantly talking in circles rather than being direct. Discredits whatever they see fit without truly explaining why everyone else should discredit. They act as though they're %100 right, but fail to fully disclose why they are correct and someone else is incorrect. They scream tolerances and calibrations yet never give any real numbers. They never ask what the given tools tolerances are and if they have been calibrated or when the last time they were calibrated. Just because you have technical training behind you and some real world exercise, doesn't mean you have the right to discredit everyone else. It's easy to sit behind a computer and seem all so intelligent. There's a common factor of why a lot of people don't like this forum. Maybe you should go and seek some education and then you might understand just how much money, time, equipment, etc... goes into testing, measuring, certifying etc. Right now it seems that all these guys are "talking circles rather then being direct" but you clearly do not understand this subject. Once you go out and find the necessary knowledge, then you will realize how right these few guys are. Until then, argue on and have fun!! I more than understand this subject. This shit is simple, yet you tech team dick riders and "tech team" want to make this complicated. Maybe you should take some laxative and the rest of the tech team to get rid of the bull shit you guys are full of. I swear you guys could ruin a wet dream because one of her nails was .05mm too long.

A lot your guy's responses remind me of soup sandwiches.

Exactly. If you challenge them, then you're %100 wrong. This whole thread is dancing in circles. The tools used to do these tests are published. It's not like they're hiding... If you're so worried about certain things, go fucking look them up. Also, it wasn't just a "clamp test" But lets only focus on one aspect of this whole damn thing. God forbid we open our eyes wider This shit reminds me about the argument over linear vs progressive spiders. Shit was completely ridiculous. You guys focus on one little aspect.