dvalue

Is that a WinMo6?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-2DEfHOgms

Yup. Ill fix your account up when i get home. Your car sounded great. Thanks again for the demo I was joking, but thanks! You're welcome!

I have the loudest set of 10" icons, do I count?

The Girl You Lost (Sander van Doorn Remix) - Sia

I'll be sending Bassahaulic this way.

A State of Trance #500 live brodcast

I know. I was there. Grats, again, buddy.

I was under the impression the CDA-117 wouldnt allow active without it.

x2 Had a lot of fun.

I removed the fb post because josh doesnt know ill be there yet and he checks fb See you guys there! Pm me for my cell..... Gotcha. Ill send you a pm.

I posted on your facebook.

I'm not saying it will or won't. I was just saying don't come in here saying, hey my M3 will, so automatically, you assume the M1 will. If you know the m1 will,that's cool. Plus I find running at a low impedance stupid. And usually only causes problems. But that's just MY opinions. People do it all the time without any. But the few that take there cheaper built amps and do it because everybody else is, and when it breaks whines about the product and in return turns people away from it. All because people like you say, my amp will, so they assume theirs does. Then look at the manufacture to fix it. Also, just because you can do it with the amp doesn't mean everybody can. A lot of variables determining either way. That's what this thread was about. People giving uncertain answers as facts and not accounting for unknown variables. Enough rant. You get the point. Yep, I'll never run my amps that low, either.

Actually there is a difference between the m3 and m1a. The m-a series are rated at 11.9 and have low voltage power supplies. The normal discontinued m series were rated at 14.4 and lacked those power supplies. I do know that m1a will play that low, actually. Plus its probably more stable than his m3, since the a series are stronger amps.

If its so totally different, tell me what the difference is, besides wattage. When did I recommend someone run their amp that low? I just said that he does. Yes, I skimmed the last couple of pages, though, out of lack of time, but it is about how there is no "real world test" and variables must be the exact same across the board to be considered accurate and say that one amp is better than another. Also, we shouldnt take amps at face value of doing true power, there will be some "give" in their ratings. Did you even read my last post? I misread 98GMC's post and didnt see how they tested, so I admitted my mistake.

Ah, I see that now.

Where are you getting this information? My local Sundown dealer is also a DD dealer and we did head to head testing! That's where i'm getting my information! How did you test "stability", how about distortion, I feel like asking this is starting over everything m5 and Imp went over... Not sure what your getting at or trying to prove! Distortion? You have a Distortion Analyzer somebody can borrow? No did not test for distortion as we didn't have the appropriate test gear to measure. Stability? 8 Kinetik HC2400's, Mechman 300 amp alt. Both amps were O-Scoped individually, crossover and SSF settings were matched best we could with naked eye. No bass Boost and HU set to 0 on Bass setting and Sub level out. All we did to test was put it on the Term-Lab, running the amps at 1 ohm and at half ohm. Both amps were very comparable on SPL. The Sundown was louder on the meter. How much I cannot remember as it was over a year ago. The DD went into protect at half ohm when voltage dropped below 12 volts and the Sundown did not. So I stand by my statement. "The DD M1A is a good amplifier in itself but just not on par with the SAZ-1500D in terms of stability at .5 ohm." Keep the SAZ-1500D you will be glad you did. Odd, a friend keeps his M3 stable at quarter ohm. Pointless? Sure, but it's stable and its what he does.

Not everyone has the mids you have. But yea, 63/80 should work fine. What mids do you have bro? And I'll try it, once I do a new enclosure. Ported 3.0 cuft at 32hz Bravox CS60CF AA Carbons are a nice set as well.

This is one of those things where the SAZ was a better amp in your setup. For others, it may be the opposite.

Not everyone has the mids you have. But yea, 63/80 should work fine. I ran my coaxes that low, too

I have my Icons crossed at 50 hz at a 12 db slope, and my mids play from 63 hz and up with an 18 db slope. It works well for me.

Honestly, I feel you are getting butthurt over the fact that someone disagreed with you. Welcome to the internet Bro i get paid to make vids.....controversy sells ...people can disagree all day.....they don't have to watch or like....and i'm very well trained in the interwebz k