Jump to content
mariobjones

Anyone Ever seen this sub??

Recommended Posts

LOL didn't audio bahn make something like this back in the day?

Model DCX34

34-Inch Dual 2 Ohm Subwoofer

Specifications:

• Magnet Weight: 500oz. / 31 pounds

• Woofer Weight: 103 kg / 227 pounds

• 24 Magnet Motor Structure

• Voice Coil Size: 5”

• Voice Coil Type: Dual 2-Ohm

• Cone Material: Aluminum; Cloth Surround

• Frequency Response: 12Hz – 600Hz

• PEAK Power Handling: 10,000 Watts

• Resonance Frequency: 21Hz

• SPL: 91dB ± 3dB

dcx34_838_detail.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.. reminds me of the Audiobahn 34"

Sadly enough, Cadence is suppose to be a well done mainstream company but if this is a copy of Audiobahn's old old oldschool sub.. then shame on Cadence..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what the enclosure recommendations are? :peepwall:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looked interesting that's why I posted it lol

Looks entertaining. No one will probably ever buy it, because for one you can get louder with more, and space required probably massive lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

or better yet.. who uses a professional circle jig for cutting that out.. back to the drawing board...

Gotta use custom compass to mount that thing..

But if this is like the audiobahn, another fail at spl output...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope not, I like cadence speakers. Haven't tired woofers, and don't plan on in future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol ya the cutout would be a pain in the butt to do lol!

hey shizzzon the audiobahn sub back in the day how many dB's were they able to get out of it? do you know off hand?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no but from what i remember, it was just a bad a dissappointment as the MTX jackhammer...

I don't know why but comeon....

IF someone is gonna go bigger, EVERYTHING must equally increase in size and performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i bet i could fail that sub wt some distortion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how there is no wrms rating. FAIL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there are circle jigs that go up to 40-50 inches for tables tops. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and that sub is an interesting table top

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the shop im with can cut up to 60 inches.

fail sub though. same category of fail as the jackhammer and steve meade in my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how there is no wrms rating. FAIL

Who the hell would want to listen to this for extended periods of time?

....shit, who would buy this for a non-spl application?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.. the better question is who WOULD BUY IT FOR SPL?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No.. the better question is who WOULD BUY IT FOR SPL?

(UPCOMING QUESTION...is da best...)

HAVE THEY EVER SOLD ONE?!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

realistically that sub is about equal to a boat anchor ..... I heard the Jackhammer a couple years ago and it had the musical ability of a trash can

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

realistically that sub is about equal to a boat anchor ..... I heard the Jackhammer a couple years ago and it had the musical ability of a trash can

^^ LMAOOO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys do realize that these types of subs are nothing more than marketing ploys. They didn't make the sub for SPL comps or to get loud. It's simply to attract attention. As for the Jackhammer, that's a totally different animal. It actually performs okay for what it is. If it was 1/4 of what it costs, you would see them quite often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys do realize that these types of subs are nothing more than marketing ploys. They didn't make the sub for SPL comps or to get loud. It's simply to attract attention. As for the Jackhammer, that's a totally different animal. It actually performs okay for what it is. If it was 1/4 of what it costs, you would see them quite often.

agreed at the marketing.

however, for what it is, which is massive, the results (in my opinion) are less than stellar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys do realize that these types of subs are nothing more than marketing ploys. They didn't make the sub for SPL comps or to get loud. It's simply to attract attention. As for the Jackhammer, that's a totally different animal. It actually performs okay for what it is. If it was 1/4 of what it costs, you would see them quite often.

Same idea as any extreme concept car that'll never sell. How many Pontiac guys bought Trans-Am's and Firebirds when they saw the Banshee?(If anybody remembers that...I'm a Pontiac-head lol)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good marketing ploy....LMAO

Check out our new sub..... it needs

5 grand worth of amplification and

charging system upgrades to operate

along with a U Haul or Cargo Van to

hold the enclosure......

when all said and done you'll have a whopping 140 Db that sounds like

cardboard boxes being crunched......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the biggest fail here is everyone bashing a sub no one knows anything about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ That.... I have owned Cadence subs before and for street gear, the CVLW122's performed pretty well. I had about 400W going to each on a KX800.4 (old one) and for what it was, it sounded pretty good. I had no complaints. Then again.... different strokes for different folks.. The 34" doesn't appeal to me, because I would like to conserve SOME space if I can. I bet my one 12 could make that one look like an expensive over-compensator.... Oh wait... It already did :D. Either way, I think it was a big 'Hey look at me!', and not the most practical application that they could have ever come up with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×