citrate

i dunno dude, you answered other threads, this one just sat there for a week unanswered. You guys know better than anyone that when a competitor needs something he cant sit around for a week for a reply. And yeah i did email ya man. Its fine, ill just call shawn direct next time, and sebasto heres my basketball, and heres my ping pong ball, lick my balls.

k forget it you guys take WAYYYYYYYY too long to answer messages, i went elsewhere.

sooooo is anyone gonna get back to me? i emailed, posted here, nick youve posted since i started this thread and i still havent heard anything from ya

So can you guys help me out?

nick, if you could email me about it at dondoyle1 at hotmail we'll hammer out the details, i gotta head to work. if i dont go with woven tinsel, would you guys also be willing to sell me 2 feet of the btl tinsel along with it? lemme know, i think were gonna change the spider to stiff, med, stiff, med, stiff. lemme know dude, lets get this ball rolling! thanks! Don D

whichever you guys think would be best suited. the problem were having with tinsels is them burning up. If you guys think woven would be better than the btl leads we'll go that route.

Hey guys, i need another recone for my MT. Im looking for dual 1.4, optimized for use with 2 powerbass xa3000d's. I want stiff but not super stiff, i was thinking quad spider, 2 stiff, 2 med stacked alternatly, with heavy duty tinsel. If you guys have another idea im open to it. Lemme know please need it asap. BTW itll be shipped to ontario canada.

i used a pca1500 last season for some local low power classed shows, and loaded down it gave me over 1600 watts on 12v system. they are solid amps

car: 1996 Dodge Neon Electrical: NSB 75, PT Cruiser Alt Amps: 1 Atomic 5000.1 Subs: 1 RE MT 12 Box: Custom Mic: TL Tone: 46 Score: (legal or outlaw) 151.3 db legal street A

the crossover and eq on the 791 are good, and if they put the xover and eq of the 891 in the 792 its VERY good.

can you explain the 1.2 db gain and lower reactive load when using the cactus? True they may have common components, but then most amps this size do. Dont think im saying the 500.1 is not a good amp, it was great and it never let me down, i did head to head testing of the 500.1, z1 (not z1A), soundstream xxx6500, and the cactus 5kw. The order of lowest to highest spl were as follows xxx6500 150.4 db ab 500.1 150.8 db DD z1 151.6 db Cactus 5kw 151.98 db as you can see, since you know your amps, the cactus and the atomic are practically the same amp but the atomic is about half the price since its based in north america. Neway if the 2 are the same as you say, why were my results so different between them? I have an idea why, but id like to hear what you think. but i think this would need a new thread lol.

uhhh yeah, they are both zenon based amps but do not share the same board LOL ever look at roe dude? 500.1 Atomic d5000.1 similar in that they both have caps coils fets transistors and heatsinks, different in that they dont share a board. Sorry for the hijack man, it was never my intention.

in my initial testing with the cactus 5kw which is basically the same as the atomic 5000, i found a 1.2 db gain in straight drop in test against the 500.1 so there are more than slight differences between them

RD audio subs are not fi products, they are SJA products

you still drive a neon.. so in my books, you're just like kevin miranda lol i might drive a neon, but its not just any neon, its the loudest street A trunk car in history And you cant compare me to kevin... Im loud LOL