Nikuk

hadnt seen that yet... nice find

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

OMGWHYISTHEINTERNATIONALHOUSEOFPOOSOSL0WLATELY?

^^ Bastard Kid Kris's avatar. Apparently someone thought he made it, then found out that they didnt. That'll cost You a quarter.

okay, skipping over the signal path for the moment, impedance drops with higher voltages. @ 2 ohm You're tantrum is rated for 1200, yes? reset the gain of the (HU @ vol 28) amp using the clamp & dmm method until You see the rated 1.2kw. Obviously, You'll need to watch for clipping. I advise an Oscope when setting gain up this way. IMO this is the "compeition method" of gain setting - You basically want to get just a tad bit of clipping. As You crank the input current, the impedance should drop further. But be careful, I dunno if You woofer's thermal rating is REALISTIC. If it's a 3" >4 layer coil, it should be fine with 1.2k actual. I dunno the specs on Your woofer, so I cannot guesstimate to other reasons. Hope it helps.

:checkin:

I havent seen him on much... was starting to worry as well... I havent even seen him on aim much.

Jim, at what volume are You testing the impedance? You are using voltage & amperage, right?

i was worried that it wouldnt be up too long, the guy posted it on Offtopic.com, so either it maxed out or he just took it down. umm, i don't know of any way to host such a big file, or to send it. any ideas?

i generally play in [MW] office and a couple others. having issues with it today tho... i'll keep an eye out for it tho.

two words (for now) ( those are not the 2 words): Ripple Voltage

Big DL but worth every single second if You like that sort of stuff.

I fully agree that a watt is a watt and his test is a great example of how to prove it. I'm not saying that it's a good test of equipment. His test is designed, in every aspect, to prove his statement. I do agree with his statement on the basic level that a hydrogen atom is a hydrogen atom... it's a matter of what you do with it. However, I fully feel that an amplifier (common retail amp with all of it's features) will affect sound. There are so many things built into amps now (digital & ab) that the mere existence of the circuitry has to effect the flow of the signal / electricity. RC's test basically guts ALL of those circuits. I'm too drunk to type more. cohearently.

Check out the other sections

yep, twins. doing things that they shouldnt. except in Arkansas 170mb & 180mb / 16 min. vid & 25 min. vid iirc http://www.candycainer.com/ot-afterhours/ Who's Your daddy?

depending on accuracy... holy chit. what transfer speeds do You see when you are acutally DL'ing something?