Duran

...

Blah Blah Blah. CHOKE ON IT! Okay, I'm done with my rant.

Uh huh, say good bye to your board!

Just asking for other input.

That's what I was getting at.

I don't trust ebay, but that's just me.

don't you have to be 40 to be Pres? 35

Hump de bump! Oh baby bump de bump!

Yellow!

Your a day late. not really just getting the train rolling for 2012! If I have to run with Palin, she has to be naked. She really should study a map too! She is a VERY bangable MILF though

I thought that was a given since he was running as a Democrat Party affiliation isn't what it used to be. The stereotypes for the two big parties don't always apply. But the Democrats knew what they were doing. Put in a black man and say he'll change everything from what Bush is doing. That's all he would have had to say. He'd get 15% of the vote just from that from all the ignorant people who knew nothing about either candidate but still had to make sure to vote, plus the 45% that the Democratic party would have gotten anyway. I think the "just go vote" mentality that all the national groups, celebrities, sports stars, etc. are telling people is misguiding. They need to change it to "Go learn about the candidates so that your vote is not in ignorance." Too many people these days vote solely on how charismatic a candidate is. Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party. I think that the 200+ year old terms, democrat and republican, need to be rethought. FYI, the "Republican" party had only been around for ~140 years. but yes, they are getting quite stale. Southern slave owners were only around 140 years ago? Are you sure about that You do know that the slave owners were by and large Democrats, the Republicans were the young, upstart radicals from the North I just totally contradicted myself. Damn it.

Isn't it your bedtime It sure is not! Thank you very much! It isn't even 9:00 here

I thought that was a given since he was running as a Democrat Party affiliation isn't what it used to be. The stereotypes for the two big parties don't always apply. But the Democrats knew what they were doing. Put in a black man and say he'll change everything from what Bush is doing. That's all he would have had to say. He'd get 15% of the vote just from that from all the ignorant people who knew nothing about either candidate but still had to make sure to vote, plus the 45% that the Democratic party would have gotten anyway. I think the "just go vote" mentality that all the national groups, celebrities, sports stars, etc. are telling people is misguiding. They need to change it to "Go learn about the candidates so that your vote is not in ignorance." Too many people these days vote solely on how charismatic a candidate is. Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party. I think that the 200+ year old terms, democrat and republican, need to be rethought. FYI, the "Republican" party had only been around for ~140 years. but yes, they are getting quite stale. Southern slave owners were only around 140 years ago? Are you sure about that

Sick lookin' box!

Yeah, I do remember reading that now that you mentioned it. EDIT: I would go with the Mayhem's. Seems everyone has BTL's. I dont have BTLs Me either.

TOP! Choke on it!

I thought that was a given since he was running as a Democrat Party affiliation isn't what it used to be. The stereotypes for the two big parties don't always apply. But the Democrats knew what they were doing. Put in a black man and say he'll change everything from what Bush is doing. That's all he would have had to say. He'd get 15% of the vote just from that from all the ignorant people who knew nothing about either candidate but still had to make sure to vote, plus the 45% that the Democratic party would have gotten anyway. I think the "just go vote" mentality that all the national groups, celebrities, sports stars, etc. are telling people is misguiding. They need to change it to "Go learn about the candidates so that your vote is not in ignorance." Too many people these days vote solely on how charismatic a candidate is. Politics are about POLICIES, not smooth talking you at a cocktail party. I think that the 200+ year old terms, democrat and republican, need to be rethought.

This brief you speak also does not have a LISCENSURE clause. Which is why Obama did not sign it. It is also not relevant and arbitrary. Damn, you left half of us in the dust with that speil!

Check dB-r for refurb Sundown amps.

Neither.

Today at work, I believe the most amazing thing of my life happened. We might start carrying AA, John asked me if I knew anything about Ascendant Audio, and I almost fainted! I told him Fi and AA are owned by the same person, and he knows how badass Fi is from me. I really hopes he goes through with it.

Look into Stinger, and Cactus Sounds. Maybe get your hands on an old DC Sounds Lab LFB-4K.

No chit.... Tech fans have a reputation for tearing their own stadium up. That's a cool way to raise tuition... I'm pretty sure with the 8-10 times that #1/#2 got beat last year the field was never stormed. Storming the field is something chitty teams do when they know it will be impossible for them to achieve more, maybe their smarter than I thought? My city is home to the 8th biggest sports rivalry in the US, I attend one of the rival high schools. The rivalry started when my school was built and we started sharing the stadium with Idaho Falls High School and the winner of the game, called the Emotion Bowl, paints the goal posts their school colors, sadly they have been orange for the past 2 years, no blue this year 8th biggest? How are these ranked. Percentage of the cities population that goes to the game. Isn't that a bit skewed towards football and other sports played in monster arenas? By that logic, the Detroit Lions are in a larger rivalry than the Red Sox Most people stand though, the Emotion bowl is too intense to sit still, you really can't just sit there.

Hello Barack Obama...