Acidburn
Moderators
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Acidburn
-
omghi2u!!1
-
the weekend of June 13-15
-
sweet, having a bare metal interior is always fun
-
what about snow-driving? not that I've ever driven in snow, just heard it's better for that Only if you drive poorly. Here is the real question on a car with a perfect 50/50 weight balance what do you think will have more snow traction fwd or rwd? Also, what will brake better? Obviously they will be the same, the question then comes down to predictability and such and having a fwd car means understeer which really, really fucks you when things get shitty. If you have one of these dumb front drive cars that are 70% front weight, then sure it will take off better but how about turning and other things? There is a reason that Mercedes and BMW don't and won't build a front drive platform, they refuse to make those compromises. Good to know. econobox technology FTL
-
I knew it... lol. Hush you. darwin?
my bad lol and in the case of fwd if he was lookin for a lil extra gas mileage. generally fwd gets u a couple extra miles a gallon False. It is a less efficient drivetrain and the only reason it exists is that it is cheaper for manufacturers to make. have a link to any more information about FWD vs RWD efficiency?
what about snow-driving? not that I've ever driven in snow, just heard it's better for that
it's 2:40am here, haven't gone to sleep yet
add my agreement to this
tell me about it I wonder if ditching the spare wheel is illegal if you use runflat's ... there's no law that says you need a spare, I just drive way too much to be without one
jigsaw with a fine tooth blade
maybe a specialty wood working store, but I've never seen one at Home Depot/Lowes/Ace
tell me about it
they work well for framing stuff out
What year? <--obvious boner for the Gal umm, mid-60s? it had vertically stacked twin headlights and a roof line similar to 65-66 Impala
nice, keep the pics coming
so that's happening tonight? **shrugs** doesn't affect me
for all the engineers here: