Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

SSA® Car Audio Forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Acidburn

Moderators
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Acidburn

  1. I don't think it's all that likely either.
  2. The only copy-cat feature I've heard of is the front-mount distributor, which is just common sense for a NASCAR car.
  3. 1998, first year for the LS1: http://mustangforums.com/timeline/1998-ford-mustang/ http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z8063/C...Camaro_Z28.aspx Last time I checked, 285 is more than 225
  4. And this right here is why everyone makes fun of you.
  5. The only reasons I can think of for Ford to do this would be reduced production costs and less weight. A Ford 5.0 is going to be really hard pressed to match a LS2 or LS3 for output though. With equal displacement why do you think the general can extract more power than Ford?? That seems absurd, in particular since the Ford design will be all new and the LS is now nearly 10 years old. Ford302Dipshit was talking about a new 5.0, which is a liter smaller than a LS2 and 1.2 liters smaller than a LS3. If Ford made them of comparable displacement, then yes, it probably would be a close match. Also, a LS3/LS7's head design is somewhat different than an old LS1. GM definitely hasn't been sitting on their thumbs since '97 when it comes to horsepower.
  6. Yep, you'll never be anything but
  7. damn
  8. For the corners of the internal air space Putting the 45* corners in the corners of the internal air space will have the same effect with a PVC port as with a slot port
  9. Surprising.
  10. did you even finish high school?
  11. So you have the Clemson logo... But don't go to Clemson... it's him, do you expect anything less?
  12. speaking of, I saw one on the street on Monday never seen one out in public before
  13. Of course, they're probably not stating the obvious unspoken thing and encouraging people to have backup power, become more self-sufficient, etc... Obvious unspoken thing being the substation that caused the reactor to go offline <--- Father's an NRC Licensed Operator Fun times in Floriduh Nuclear power is so purdy... yummy
  14. studying for an Abnormal Psych test this evening....
  15. Yep.
  16. NP: Metallica - One
  17. The only reasons I can think of for Ford to do this would be reduced production costs and less weight. A Ford 5.0 is going to be really hard pressed to match a LS2 or LS3 for output though.
  18. Said they're only considering it now. Only time will tell.
  19. wtf would they use them for? Rumor has it, Ford is going back to the pushrod motor in the new stang. I'm going to remain extremely skeptical until I hear from someone who actually knows what they're talking about.
  20. LOL that's ridiculous
  21. wtf would they use them for?
  22. I haven't heard any confirmed yet. But the LS2 or LS3 will probably be the base V8 with LS7 and LS9 possibilities.
  23. I go back and forth on whether I like it or not as well
  24. Camaro Countdown: http://www.5thgen.org/countdown/

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.