mrray13

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

u see, nick??? u see what u started again??? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

3.5ft^3 per is the max listed size... a couple of things..... the big enclosure will allow the suspension to move more with the power. so, u'll displace more air. but, like u mentioned, u're going to lose some mechanical power handling ability. the bigger box will most likely cause a loss of power as impedence rises in larger enclosures. but u'll have to graph it and see where the spike comes in.... and i think u'll lose a bit of ur sq in the larger box. but then again, i like to build my enclosures on the smallish side anyway.... and in ur explorer (i saw where u were getting an 01 sport) ur going to benefit from the vehicles transient response, in short, ur going to be loud as hell anyway....lol... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

wow..i missed this...lol.. glad it's in a nice, new home....a proper home!! congrats ont he purchase man!! and wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

oh chit..lol....with ur dual 15" rl-p's..u'll be deaf...lol.. and there is nothing wrong with kicker, unless absolutely everybody u know is running them and u want to be different. i likes my s18x... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

i wouldn't think 150 per pair would blow the crossovers... but again, i'd look into the sq x-overs...they are biampable and of course built a bit better... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

solid amps...they are kinda the unknown mainstreme amp, but they retain the mainstreme price... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

can't wait to see the difference between those two...that's going to be a sweet lil comparo... good luck with these future events!!! wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

I forgot you played with the proto. My bad. lol... IIRC, it was u who told me it wouldn't perform at it's best in the 2.5ft^3 i played it in...u said 3ft^3minimum for ported enclosure and u were correct. while it did a respectable job in the 2.5ft^3 enclosure, i'm sure a larger one would indeed do it justice. btw, the new mag is a very clean sounding driver, easily as clean as the xxx and rl-p. of those three, the rl-p and mag drop the lowest in smaller boxes, and i mean they drop low. the xxx needs a larger sealed or ported box to run with either of these two in the lowlow department. (not saying it can't, but it does need enclosure help to do it) wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Hell, I don't remember that. It works very well in a minimum of 2.2 sealed, but damn, I had my old one in 3 cubes vented and it sounded horrible. Funny that I would suggest that. Hell, I don't know. hey, this ring a bell??? if ya want, maybe i dig up some of our IM convo's concerning it...lol... either way, no biggie..just givin ya a bit of grief... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

i hear ya...lol.. i'm going to play with the s18x some more...go smaller enclosure, get a 2ohm stable amp (or two one ohm stable ones) and see where i get it on the TL... wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

I forgot you played with the proto. My bad. lol... IIRC, it was u who told me it wouldn't perform at it's best in the 2.5ft^3 i played it in...u said 3ft^3minimum for ported enclosure and u were correct. while it did a respectable job in the 2.5ft^3 enclosure, i'm sure a larger one would indeed do it justice. btw, the new mag is a very clean sounding driver, easily as clean as the xxx and rl-p. of those three, the rl-p and mag drop the lowest in smaller boxes, and i mean they drop low. the xxx needs a larger sealed or ported box to run with either of these two in the lowlow department. (not saying it can't, but it does need enclosure help to do it) wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

good morning kinda... and ryan..what would u do with a s18x?? wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee