///M5

*pukes* Knew it was coming weeks ago from the dipshit posts. Not so amusing how predictable morons are.

And rude too, pretty damn disrespectful to not follow the rules you agreed to when you joined the site. And of course, in those rules all of the information needed is defined. *if you are lazy, turn on sigs, there are links in mine lol i bet most of the people that joined this site didnt read the rules... like really grow up LOL if you needed/wanted info just ask for it... dont have to be a dick about it... If you weren't a disrespectful little shit, you'd get a lot more help from everyone. The growing up is your end. Pretty fucking rude to call someone names multiple times and tell them to grow up and expect help. Nice move. That'll get you far in life. Gotta love it when you can even fail on a web forum. Stupid thing is, it hurts you and amuses me. Keep it up

If you are so sure why did you ask the question. I don't care how knowledgeable I am either, everyday I still try to learn. You should as well, you might find that it suites you. As for need, you've proved one thing and that is you need a lot. It isn't like Geometry is a new subject, been around for centuries and determining what you have isn't all that difficult. What have you tried besides throwing your arms up in the air and whining for help?

And rude too, pretty damn disrespectful to not follow the rules you agreed to when you joined the site. And of course, in those rules all of the information needed is defined. *if you are lazy, turn on sigs, there are links in mine

My cats breath smells like cat food

Those have been floating around for a while, when these are gone I bet you won't see anymore.

Now I see why you are opposed to "bashing" in threads as you are too lazy to bother to make a good one or search yourself. Geometry hasn't changed for years. Of course curves can mean many things so its pretty hard to respond. Tons of tricks, but some specifics would help. Try it both ways. Best way to really determine. If you want to know more of why, perhaps explain what you want to achieve, what you have for space, where it goes, etc. etc etc. As for its own chamber. Pros and cons. Again, don't know which would apply to you, but if I have to make an assumption on what you've given us its that you can't do geometry very well so with what you've given us I'd say put them in the same chamber. lol how am i supposed to make one myself when ive never done it before.... if your gonna be a douche just dont post on my threads...k...thx... and try it both ways ?? what do you mean by both ways....port on bottom and then try it on top ?? im not gonna build a box... then rebuild it just to find out it sounds the same.... i want to hit atleast 150db.....how do i measure the space i have ?? as you can tell the top of the car is wider than the bottom cause of the struts... I said search yourself. As for the rest, again you fail to think, follow any sort of forum etiquette, nor tell us anything about your goals. Whoop de do, glad you want to hit 150dB you obviously know exactly what that means, lol. If you don't share details no one can help you. At the same time, if for what you have your goals are lofty then you may need to make more than 2 attempts to achieve it. Pretty sad to give up before you even cut the wood.

A 2007 Mercedes Benz ML63. What kind of small dick question was that?

As others stated you didn't really get help as no one is really understanding what you want. From the title alone we understand you want calculation help, but outside that you've lost me. If its just to calculate 2.5cuft then that's do-able, but I hope not. I am rather curious on your whole premise though. You included a picture of a frequency response plot for what you describe as: 2003 Ford focus 12" SI Mag re coned with fi softparts. So basically its the same spec as a Fi Q Personally in your plots I don't at all see how you accounted for the cabin gain of the Focus and at the same time am also dying to know how you plotted a driver for which you have no T/S parameters. Unless of course you've measured them or had them measured, but you obviously aren't using manufacturers specs for a 12" SI Mag with some Fi Q parts....

LOL, just realized he's from FL. Should have guessed.

Now I see why you are opposed to "bashing" in threads as you are too lazy to bother to make a good one or search yourself. Geometry hasn't changed for years. Of course curves can mean many things so its pretty hard to respond. Tons of tricks, but some specifics would help. Try it both ways. Best way to really determine. If you want to know more of why, perhaps explain what you want to achieve, what you have for space, where it goes, etc. etc etc. As for its own chamber. Pros and cons. Again, don't know which would apply to you, but if I have to make an assumption on what you've given us its that you can't do geometry very well so with what you've given us I'd say put them in the same chamber.

That moron is dreaming....or that treadmill has reverse.

Escalades were Cadillac's the last time I looked Nice move on the Ford!!

They aren't the fastest trucks, but they just really don't care what they pull and have great power. Buddy has one. Uber shitty. Drives like 1965 Now you of all people should know better than to compare that to the AMG. Last time I drove it was when I was still tooling around in the Silverado, lol. The '11 drives considerably better than the '04 we have (considerably better in every single aspect actually), but it is good for what it is, a work truck that is fine towing 8,000lbs. Ours are the 2500HD, the '04 is a Chevy and the '11 is a GMC. Yeah the 07+ GM trucks are light years ahead of the older models, especially in the steering and braking department It was a 2011

I would, but not if you say half or a quarter. When setup to not exceed your supply its fine, but that may not be trivial for you considering how you asked the question

Napolean complex? Grow up.

Mk, it'll run my whole house. I don't want the delay of a software portal as it'll kill my dvr capabilities

Yay; off to Boston on buttfuck airlines

And if a real one doesn't get cheaper, I'll just keep my old laptop under the couch and an old school remote for the DVR....like I've been doing. Just figure after nearly 2 years of wait that something would come along.

Not saying it didn't drive nicer than the Silvy, but not saying it did either.

They aren't the fastest trucks, but they just really don't care what they pull and have great power. Buddy has one. Uber shitty. Drives like 1965 Now you of all people should know better than to compare that to the AMG. Last time I drove it was when I was still tooling around in the Silverado, lol.

You could pick up a number of sleeker Android tablets for that price. Which won't work for my application. Using an RDP or soft translator will make a delay that will make button presses NOT capable of ffwd on a dvr. What about the tablet i posted ^ I thought I responded, my computer must have hung. Sort of the only option, but some terrible reviews on it from those that have tried. Supposedly way slower than the specs suggest. I appreciate you pointing it out though. Thank you!

You could pick up a number of sleeker Android tablets for that price. Which won't work for my application. Using an RDP or soft translator will make a delay that will make button presses NOT capable of ffwd on a dvr.

Only cause their british. Worst of all the nice ute choices BY FAR. Escalade? If they made an ss I am sure it would take the worst title back Last 'scalade I saw had a 6.0L and AWD. How much more SS do you need? A lot. If it can't keep up with the AMG, I'm not interested. The 6.0L is a dog in the trucks for what it is so I can't imagine it being better in the hood beast. They aren't the fastest trucks, but they just really don't care what they pull and have great power. Buddy has one. Uber shitty. Drives like 1965

Regrettably its the best and only real option. Supposedly slow as in way slower than the specs say