///M5
SSA Tech Team
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by ///M5
-
Shit I think they rent for $400/day here. Maybe I'm crazy, but its been 8 years since I've rented one so perhaps its my memory. -
que? I need to landscape, grade, and move some heavy stuff around the yard. Rental company delivers. tempted... really tempted. Owning would be much more fun though. Especially some beat up older one. I would get romanian and landscape my yard daily. Also it would help with my insanely long driveway. I did just get a new snowblower, but you can never have too many toys. Obviously you haven't priced them.
-
Hopefully someday there won't be so much discrepancy
-
-
Oh, and little wang rocks
-
If there wasn't a picture I couldn't have done it
-
That would blow. Going up the coast to SF, we had to fill up at the only gas station for a few hundred miles, it was $5.6 , $5.70, $5.80 That's more expensive than on our lake, lol. There's a station at a lake we go to with old ass pumps that don't go past $4.00 a gallon. They're busy as hell when gas goes past 4 a gallon. Last time it did they quit selling gas LOL. Price went up, we went out of business.
Total placebo effect. Kari's Volvo gets better mileage on Premium versus shit gas. Of course it was designed for it and detunes itself if you run cheap fuel. Just for clarity, it should never be called cheap to infer that it is of lesser quality like most would think but only that it is monetarily cheaper. The only difference in octane is stability. 87 is less stable than 93. So if your car does not predetonate on less stable fuel then running a more stable fuel only makes in marginally harder for the car to combust the gas, which would theoretically decrease efficiency. Cheap as in price. Very familiar with the difference Almost said lower octane or used a number but gas varies in different states so I didn't.
That would blow. Going up the coast to SF, we had to fill up at the only gas station for a few hundred miles, it was $5.6 , $5.70, $5.80 That's more expensive than on our lake, lol.
Total placebo effect. Kari's Volvo gets better mileage on Premium versus shit gas. Of course it was designed for it and detunes itself if you run cheap fuel.
Depends on the car. If there is heavy processing on the signal before the leads you'd tap into you will need more than a LOC and something to electronically reconstruct the signal. Some cars also use low level outs in which case you wouldn't need a LOC. As for the Caddy, I have no idea what the hell GM is doing...and that extends to more than audio.
Bought time. Prohibition be gone.
Ahhhhh, butt hurt? Can't take the fact that you were confused enough to blow a great sub and had to buy a budget replacement. That JL is a great sub, the Skar a budget piece I'd never own. I understand you think differently, but you also have operation issues with subs anyways so I'd encourage the OP to just ignore your opinion. i have had many subs and the w6/w7 subs sounded good but they cant take power im not the only person that has blown these subs off clean power. why do u hate on skar because it can take more power get louder and sound good doing it for way less money. if jl subs cost 150-200 than it would be a great sub but they cost way to much for an ok sub there are alot of better subs out there for the money now this is not 2003 its 2011 new and better shit out there deal with it Rofl. Take power is a who gives a shit spec. It means nothing. Sound good is subjective and your hearing obviously sucks, of course if it didn't you wouldn't have so many issues, and get louder is just plain laughable. If you buy a w6 for the sole purpose of getting loud you bought the wrong sub. I'd actually agree that for the money (comparing msrp) there are better subs than the JL, I just wouldn't put the Skar into that category. well i do i know few people that sold there w6's for skar's after they checked out my setup. my hearing sucks lol i think you should do a pucking sound test with both subs and make a vid and see what every 1 thinks Make a vid, man you are full of "useful" ideas. As for sound test that is laughable. You misled others, hope you feel good about it.
Ahhhhh, butt hurt? Can't take the fact that you were confused enough to blow a great sub and had to buy a budget replacement. That JL is a great sub, the Skar a budget piece I'd never own. I understand you think differently, but you also have operation issues with subs anyways so I'd encourage the OP to just ignore your opinion. i have had many subs and the w6/w7 subs sounded good but they cant take power im not the only person that has blown these subs off clean power. why do u hate on skar because it can take more power get louder and sound good doing it for way less money. if jl subs cost 150-200 than it would be a great sub but they cost way to much for an ok sub there are alot of better subs out there for the money now this is not 2003 its 2011 new and better shit out there deal with it Rofl. Take power is a who gives a shit spec. It means nothing. Sound good is subjective and your hearing obviously sucks, of course if it didn't you wouldn't have so many issues, and get louder is just plain laughable. If you buy a w6 for the sole purpose of getting loud you bought the wrong sub. I'd actually agree that for the money (comparing msrp) there are better subs than the JL, I just wouldn't put the Skar into that category.
They are all musical enough for you....which means BTL or BL all the way. Only reason to not BTL in your case is budget.
Ahhhhh, butt hurt? Can't take the fact that you were confused enough to blow a great sub and had to buy a budget replacement. That JL is a great sub, the Skar a budget piece I'd never own. I understand you think differently, but you also have operation issues with subs anyways so I'd encourage the OP to just ignore your opinion.
Non-audible doesn't offend them? Fuck, I'd rather hear it than smell it and usually you get to choose.
This will go nowhere positive so its closed. If the OP wants to have a discussion about something it is fine, but no need to air or connect this to another thread.
Couldn't agree more. Obviously butt hurt by reality.