I was wondering if anyone had some objective data or even and explanation as to why a high end processor would sound better then a low end processor/receiver. I understand that subjective listening plays a role in what people prefer and that some audiophiles look at audio more as a hobby but is there a hardware reason that impacts sound quality? I am not talking about double blind tests and the side that states everything sounds the same but as of yet I have not found any objective data that would justify this night and day difference. I have searched the internet for sometime and found a profile on photobucket that has quite a selection of photo's, yes some people will know the name but it is irrelevant, I will post them below. Mods if you want to change all the IMG pictures back into a text link that is ok. If you are going to post something along the lines of the high end having a better design or using better parts could you please post some information to clarify those statements. Thank you. Theta digital casablanca III ExtremePremium.jpg Premium-BB-1796-DAC.jpg Premiumclose.jpg Six-Shooter-interior.jpg Theta-3.gif Thetaboards.jpg ThetaCB3.jpg Volume-control-card.jpg Arcam FMJ AVR600/FMJ AV888 arcam-avr600-internal-dsp.jpg arcam-avr600-internal-video.jpg arcam-avr600-modules.jpg arcam-avr600-power-amp.jpg arcam-avr600-powersupply.jpg B&K reference 70 P1010021.jpg Cary cinema 11a Classe SSP-800 SSP800-Board1.jpg SSP800-Board2.jpg SSP800-Board3.jpg SSP800-Transformer.jpg Krell evolution 707 707inside1.jpg Lexicon MC-12 smr_41.jpg Mark Levinson Nº 40 mark-levinson-no-40-ssp-video-proce.jpg Mcintosh MX135 MX136 42080587rx4.jpg HPIM0632.jpg HPIM0633.jpg HPIM0634.jpg HPIM0636.jpg HPIM0637.jpg HPIM0640.jpg HPIM0641.jpg HPIM0691.jpg HPIM0710.jpg mcd500insidetr9.jpg mcintosh-mda-1000-inside-chassis.jpg