December 23, 200717 yr Author insidehttp://a311.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/image...d6b0b4b83c6.jpghttp://a798.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/image...0013fb2fa95.jpgtrunkhttp://a425.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/image...d76f450c9e0.jpg
December 23, 200717 yr Aside from the controversy, which I'm glad we all agree on, you did a really great job man. Looks clean, how does it sound though??? lolFrom your perspective, cuz I could see your customer just saying it was better and not even knowing.great work man
December 23, 200717 yr ida kept with the XXX imo the MX doesnt "need" 2 md3 to get out of it whats needed
December 24, 200717 yr Author Thanks,For right now I did not have the strapping module for the two MD3d's so I have an amp on each coil of the MX. With it operating this way even the MX sounded like it was lacking power a bit. It will be perfectly complete once i get those two amps strapped. Have not mic'd just the 18 alone yet but it sounds like mid 140's legal at the 30-35hz range. After tuning everything at the shop it ended up sounding very good. I was playing the Kottonmouth Kings DVD and I must say I thought the XXX components sounded very clean and not too bright. The rockford components I put in the doors were a bit too bright but def. sounded better then any other rockford speakers I have installed. What seemed like a strange idea for a setup ended up working out pretty well. I backed the 12's off quite a bit. Once they were sealed off completely they sounded clean just picking up most overtones that the 18 did not. I made plates for the sides and recessed the amplifiers all upside down which is not pictured. I will try and get some better pics up when the customer returns from AZ after christmas. Edited December 24, 200717 yr by ss-audio
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.