im getting ready to build a sealed for for an 87 trans am, for 2 soundsplitter rl-p 12's. i think i'm going to have to use the entire well to get over 1 cubic foot per speaker, but i'm not sure exactly what im going to be working with, and this will be my first custom box. any tips, hints, blueprints, pictures, any kind of help anyone with a third generation f-body can give me?

any thoughts on ideal air specs for running about 700 watts to each sub? i want to use 2 separate chambers right? thanks,

Shaun

http://thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthread.php...threadid=306257

here are the plans from a third gen website to build a box for the well. i tried for hours, but couldnt figure out how many cubic ft. this would yield me. could someone please take a look at this and tell me if it will give me enough for my rl-p's? thanks a lot,

Shaun

http://thirdgen.org/techbb2/showthread.php...threadid=306257

here are the plans from a third gen website to build a box for the well. i tried for hours, but couldnt figure out how many cubic ft. this would yield me. could someone please take a look at this and tell me if it will give me enough for my rl-p's? thanks a lot,

Shaun

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Plenty for the RL-P

My figures came up with roughly 2.28 before you add in the 8" slant. Your probly looking at 2.4 total. so 1.2 per sub, wich is plenty for the RL-P

-Justin

I'd help, but I'm perma-banned from 3rdgen. Sorry

-Nick

I'd help, but I'm perma-banned from 3rdgen. Sorry

-Nick

but ur not banned here bonehead....lol.....

so i'll help ya out...

and anyone else needing 3g fbody plans..lol..

wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

http://www.soundsolutionsaudio.com/forum/i...wtopic=3647&hl=

lmao how did you manage to get banned from there?

and i do want to use separate chambers for each sub right?

You dont need to. But if you want, go right ahead

so it makes no difference in the sound, other than taking up a bit of airspace for the separating piece?

No difference at all.

Yes, just takes up airspace

Actually... having common chamber will slightly reduce transients

But.. to the ear.. no different

im an idiot, what do you mean by reduce transients?

Read the last part of this little article, might be able to explain it well for you.

http://www.speakerbuilding.com/content/1011/page_2.php

Oh like he will hear that.

Thats like inverting the cone.....its less cone area. The VC isnt part of the SD now is it.

But.. to the ear.. no different

Also... having a common chamber will eliminate the need for each side of the enclosure to be exactly the same airspace.

scratches head... lol