Posted March 30, 201114 yr Honestly I couldn't care less about the subjective reviews that will be posted. Far more interested in the T/S parameters and other objective measurements you have, such as an FR graph It makes sense to not care how a speaker sounds in actuality rather than how the paper says it sounds.What a tool. :-/What one person thinks sounds good, may NOT be what another person thinks sounds good. So what good would it do Impious to know how someone else thinks it sounds.
March 30, 201114 yr Honestly I couldn't care less about the subjective reviews that will be posted. Far more interested in the T/S parameters and other objective measurements you have, such as an FR graph It makes sense to not care how a speaker sounds in actuality rather than how the paper says it sounds.Seriously?
March 30, 201114 yr Honestly I couldn't care less about the subjective reviews that will be posted. Far more interested in the T/S parameters and other objective measurements you have, such as an FR graph It makes sense to not care how a speaker sounds in actuality rather than how the paper says it sounds.What a tool. :-/What one person thinks sounds good, may NOT be what another person thinks sounds good. So what good would it do Impious to know how someone else thinks it sounds.I agree to the bold.I could tell somebody these are the best sound drivers in the world.But that wouldn't matter much.I'm not saying I go by T/S specs and response graph, but plenty do.I think we already come to the conclusion "real world" results don't justify anything on this site.Hard data and facts only. Which I'm not disagreeing with.Real world has to many variables and bias opinions to even do justice.
March 30, 201114 yr Static data doesn't show how it sounds either; in reality you would just have to hear it yourself -- but I will post a good FR graph from an American measurement company when they come in anyway. Or perhaps I'll just smooth the under 100 Hz response on my current graph to remove the baffle size error.
March 30, 201114 yr Honestly I couldn't care less about the subjective reviews that will be posted. Far more interested in the T/S parameters and other objective measurements you have, such as an FR graph It makes sense to not care how a speaker sounds in actuality rather than how the paper says it sounds.You sir, are an idiot. Let's not clutter this thread with your complete lack of understanding of acoustics and most things in general, which you have thoroughly demonstrated thus far in our encounters. Keep the posts in this thread on topic or they will be removed. If you wish to discuss objective driver evaluations (and your apparently lacking ability to understand them) versus subjective listening impressions (differences which you clearly don't understand), start another thread and we can gladly discuss it.
March 31, 201114 yr As I said, this thread is specifically regarding the presale on the Neo-Pro 8 /10. If you want to discuss other topics, create another thread for dicussion of those other topics as I stated above. This thread IS NOT going to be crowded with crap not directly related to the presale or information regarding the drivers. It's simply not fair to Jacob. Debating the merits of objective measurements and subjective listening impressions is not directly related to the presale or the drivers. Hence, posts go *poof*. This will be the last post in this thread regarding that matter.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.