Posted September 19, 201311 yr Vehicle : 2010 Toyota Tundra DCLocation in the vehicle: back passenger sideBox size: W:22, H:19, D:17, using 3/4" = 3.0 cubesSubwoofer make and model: SSA ZCON 12 D2Subwoofer Size: 12"Number of Subwoofers: 1Type of Port: Aero Preferably (have a flared 3" aero already in my possession)What type of music do you like?: DNBEveryday listeningTuning Freq (Hz): 31hzVolume : 3.0-------------------------------So my question, is the 3" aeroport going to be large enough diameter for this sub? I've read where people have used ports that were too small for the sub utilized, and didn't want to run into the same issue. Any further suggestions or ideas for box and/or port(s) is welcome. If you have further questions for me in regards to this, feel free to ask as well.
September 19, 201311 yr One 3" aeroport does not have enough area. What amp / power will you be using?
September 19, 201311 yr Author RF 1500BDCP, and since it isn't enough area, i guess it will have to be a square port then
September 19, 201311 yr You can play around with port area here: http://bitpusher.in/?p=portgraph&driver=3&xdrivers=1&rms=1500&tuning=31#bottom
September 19, 201311 yr Author messing around and researching, i see where it says square port HxW ratio shouldnt be more than 1:8, what is the reasoning behind that?
September 19, 201311 yr Author understood about the big boxes, hence i wasnt going minimum volume requirement chose a happy medium at 3 cubes
September 19, 201311 yr understood about the big boxes, hence i wasnt going minimum volume requirement chose a happy medium at 3 cubesThat's what I was running mine at. Some people on the forum suggested bigger.
September 19, 201311 yr Author i cannot go any larger then the box dimensions given in the first post..that is the largest i can go without taking seats out, and i am not willing to do that
September 19, 201311 yr If you have more room, go even bigger on lower powerThats what I wanted to say.
September 19, 201311 yr Author i could go up with height some, and possibly depth, but width is restricted to 22.5..unless i had a non-rectangular box, then that would add 13 x 6 box to the bottom
September 19, 201311 yr Author let me go back to the drawing board with this... thanks for everyones input. it is much appreciated
September 19, 201311 yr messing around and researching, i see where it says square port HxW ratio shouldnt be more than 1:8, what is the reasoning behind that?The above link shows no port height to width ratio, its port area vs port speed.
September 19, 201311 yr eric is the 13x6 the area between the seat brackets? Is that centered in the 22.5 you have for width? I can start working something up, too... Also- a depth top and depth bottom....a wedge will get you some needed volume. Guys- would a sub forward/port up work well? OR we could use the 13x6 area for port and extend it forward pointing under the pass seat...I have some ideas...
September 19, 201311 yr eric is the 13x6 the area between the seat brackets? Is that centered in the 22.5 you have for width? I can start working something up, too... Also- a depth top and depth bottom....a wedge will get you some needed volume. Guys- would a sub forward/port up work well? OR we could use the 13x6 area for port and extend it forward pointing under the pass seat...I have some ideas...I used the port up in my jeep and liked it.
September 19, 201311 yr Author yeah the 13x6 area is between the seat brackets, i have to get back to my truck to verify that it is centered in the 22.5, still stuck offshore..unsure when i will get back in
September 20, 201311 yr I am thinking along these lines...haven't done the math- just a general sketch.
September 20, 201311 yr I was in a hurry when I made the last post...to be clear, that is to the dimensions 22wx19hx17d with the port being 13wx5.25h(for a net of 11.5x4.5, 52ci of port, ~17ci per ft^3) The math I didn't work out was the port length needed. Just wanted to know if the theory of the external port was solid first.
September 20, 201311 yr Author messing around and researching, i see where it says square port HxW ratio shouldnt be more than 1:8, what is the reasoning behind that?The above link shows no port height to width ratio, its port area vs port speed.i was also googling stuff up, in addition to your link you provided.
September 20, 201311 yr Author Leedog, the seat rails are not spaced evenly side to side, from the left rail to the wall is 5.25", from the right rail to the wall is 3.25
September 20, 201311 yr So that port would be running under the seat?Did I miss what kind of vehicle?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.