Jump to content

RJT2011

Members
  • Content Count

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About RJT2011

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    statesboro
  1. RJT2011

    What sub would perform better in this box?

    The DCONs are great subs but the GCONs will be better for your application. The quote button is in the bottom right corner of each post. Ahhh my iPhone hid it Til I actually clicked the bottom right corner. Damn man thanks a lot you've helped me the most with my sub setup so far.
  2. RJT2011

    What sub would perform better in this box?

    Idk how to quote on here yet but Steve why didn't you like the sa's? And I hadn't even looked at the dcons. Now I'm wondering if they'd do better in my box haha. But I feel that my amp would overpower them unless I turned it down if that's even possible. I'm gonna figure out this audio stuff eventually I love it too much not to.
  3. RJT2011

    What sub would perform better in this box?

    Thanks for the input guys....bout to order the gcons. Think they'll bump pretty hard in a downfiring box? My only worry is they won't be loud enough I'm fairly sure they'll sound clean though most sealed boxes I've heard do. They just seem to have not as much volume but these subs seem pretty damn legit and I know my sundown amp is at least decent.
  4. RJT2011

    What sub would perform better in this box?

    Ok thanks! Will it be a big deal that my sundown 1200 won't be able to push them to their rms rating?
  5. RJT2011

    What sub would perform better in this box?

    Thanks for the replies! I also just noticed the skar audio vvx10. I looked around and it seems that if you divide the Fms number(hertz) and the qes number and the result is below 50 and up to about 75, then a sealed box is better suited. Well I may have screwed up royally because I'm so new to this but I did the sa which came out to be 64.5, the gcon, which came out to be 61.4, and the vvx, which came out to be 57.8. Now assuming I did right, does that mean the skar would work best in a sealed box compared? I also read that if your box doesn't have enough cubes it doesn't sound as good. Taking sub displacement into account wouldn't that mean that .83 cubes would not suit well with the gcon? The skar needs .65 and after displacement I figured that'd put it closer to optimal output than the g con or sa. I know I'm probably wrong so please correct me people haha.
  6. RJT2011

    What sub would perform better in this box?

    Thanks for the offer man but I'm really just trying to decide between the gcon and sa. Being that the box won't have enough ft to support the gcon what does that mean? G con needs .85 this one has .83 and I think it will lose more ft when the sub is installed? I think that's displacement? I'd aprreciate some help guys!
  7. Ok this is one of my first posts and I'm pretty audio ignorant so bear with me. I have a 2008 silverado duramax crew cab and a sundown 1200 mono amp. I know the box has to go under the seat unless I do crazy customization so there isn't much room. The box that has been recommended to me by a few people is this one http://subthump.com/Chevrolet-GMC-Sub-Boxes/Silverado-Sierra-Crew-Cab/07-Up-New-Body-Style-GM-Crew-Cab-Dual-Downfire-Box.html It holds 2 10s and has a mounting depth of 6.5 with .83 ft per chamber and it's sealed. Downfiring. I know a g con and a sa10 would fit but the sa 10 requires .5ft while the gcon ranges from .85-1.25. I need to know what two subs would sound better with that setup, and im open for suggestions on a dif box too! Any help will be appreciated I messaged denim about it but I feel bad for bothering the guy he's busy I know.
  8. Well that's awesome then! Its on a truck for delivery in my town so i'll have it back in soon!!
  9. I'm hoping thats what it was! I sent it to Jacob. Oh i'm relieved too i was more stressed about this than my work. I can't wait to bump again!!!
  10. ok got a tracking number today so i guess it is fixed or either a new one is on the way. Jacob hasn't gotten back to me yet about what went wrong but i'm sure he will when he has time...i'm guessing it was the amp as i didn't get charged for shipping or anything. I can't wait to find out what the issue was!
  11. the amp and sub. oh well the low levels just make it so you dont need a loc or anything so no chance of DC being on the lines.
  12. No, didn't use a Loc, just tapped into the low level inputs which didn't have DC on them. I'm not sure whether its a v1 or v2 but i got it brand new a few months ago from the SSA store.
  13. i already sent it in i'm just doing everything i can to rule out installer error. That's all i'm going for. i want to do everything i can myself to pinpoint the problem while i wait. I've ruled out stock electrical, it can handle it, as i know camaro owners with this amp. i've ruled out DC on the RCA's, and i've ruled out the ground wire. Just looking for the next thing to check
  14. I checked the battery and oem alternator as posted above. they are well above the capacity to handle my amp. i have people who are running my amp in their camaro, same year, but with different subs. i know a guy with a sax 1500 on his camaro with stock battery and its going fine. my 14.6 volt can handle it. So how about you stop wasting my time with replies on things i've already checked. you "mine" as well back off.
  15. I checked the battery and oem alternator as posted above. they are well above the capacity to handle my amp. i have people who are running my amp in their camaro, same year, but with different subs. i know a guy with a sax 1500 on his camaro with stock battery and its going fine. my 14.6 volt can handle it. So how about you stop wasting my time with replies on things i've already checked. you "mine" as well back off.
×