braapboogcafish

X2 on this, I know they now use a UFO style motor and have had other changes as well. Love how they look know but I'd still grab the previous version if the difference in sound is better.

Your title is kind of deceiving. But glws

damn those are nice! ive always been curious as to how ssa subs sound, let me know if you decide to sell the other one.

The front pre outs on my 880 went out a while ago, been using it as is since then without an issue. That new 80prs is tempting but i just cant shake wanting a 800prs, that black face and copper body are nice! Pm me, i might be interested in your 880..

Damn sorry for not replying sooner. It sounds great and has great output, i like it a lot, slams in my 2000 xj. I like it so much I'm actually doing a .7 tuned to 31-32ish. just a bit less size than the sa8 box, and lower tune since ill be using a skar vvx-8.

no, i dont want 37hz tuning. and yes musical is always a must. i just didnt forsee this setup coming up so short in his truck, the airspace of his truck vs the hatchback didnt seem like that huge of a difference to me. hes real happy with how it sounds on everyday music (i am too) but still wishes it could get louder. were gonna do what i said in my most recent msg and if that doesnt work then im recommending him to either get another 8 or just go for 10s or 12s. if it was my truck i would have it full of sound deadener, upgraded alt and electricals and the works..but he just cant spend that much cash so other options need to be used instead for now.

i vote 4 sa-8s for the wow factor

yea i seen that after testing he dropped the rec spec size to .5-.7 for any amount of power. and power efficiency isnt a need in this setup, no lack of power from the brz1200.1. we kind of played around with placement, more like port direction. still have to try actually moving the box around the back seat more. and might try a smaller box just for the heck of it

Why does someone need to tell me that? I already know it. Im just trying to see what others have experienced with the same or similar setups, is something wrong with that?

no worries man i dont take offense to that. the guy that gave me the box design says it has 13.3 sq inches of port area. i just wrote 10-13.3 because im not sure if i fully know how to read the RE calc right yet. these are the numbers for the re calc 19 9.5 14 14 0.75 1.25 12

i think it looks badass, ive always appreciated a quality flat black look. BUT i think this is one of the dumbest things you can do to your car if its a car you care about. first of all IT STAINS, its not a smooth finish so it holds in dirt and other things and is a bitch to clean and over time theres no way you can avoid it staining. and i know youve all seen how bedliner looks when it fades and deteriorates, not nice at all. if it wasnt for these things i would be all over it, because the plus sides are great...heavy duty explains it all

i agree with focusing on the front stage. you dont need more than a front stage in a reg cab truck anyways.

nice man, nice. can you explain that fake factory radio face you have in there?

Just wondering how your sa-8s perform in your extra cab midsize to fullsize trucks. Installed a single sa-8 into a x-cab 2008 F-150, .75ft^3 tuned to 33ish with i think either 10 or 13.3 sq inches of port area (im a noob at sub enclosures). The box came out perfect and right on spec. Not satisfied with the results, the tuning sounds good and it sounds good musically but it just doesnt get loud enough, gets 1/4-1/3 as loud as it does in my friends car. Tested it on 2 different amps at 4 ohms, zx400.1 and kx1200.1. so it was getting 200rms first then 400+. small difference in output. Im wondering if his truck needs a bigger or smaller box to achieve more output? How does this sound to you?

yea he only posted 6 numbers so i couldnt really do anything with it since its not a complete design for that calc. also i was wondering if sub displacement brings the tuning higher or lower?