OuTLaWeD

Please don't go off youtube ideas! Post a new thread and we can design you an awesome enclosure for YOUR needs

Lets test out the Dolphin beta browser mobile. Seems pretty sweet right now!

I had a buddy run a BRZ at. 5ohms for over a year now without issue. They are solid amps for sure! The PPI that Rick suggested wouldn't be all that bad either. Too bad jbl still doesn't have the collaboration with Crown, super cheap pretty bad ass amps

seriously dude?

Honestly, the Hifonics BRZ series is not that bad. If I were on a budget that's the first amp I would look at.

I've seen the same with my own eyes and enclosures I've built.

Didn't Snoop Dogg change his name and start making reggae?

Having a larger port opening will allow air to escape from the enclosure easier and reduse the holding "vacuum" on the subwoofers cone. Having a smaller port opening will restrict the flow of air out of the enclosure and keep "vacuum" on the cone so the cone can't move as freely even above tuning.

Most of the information above was in taken from my SSA Evil. Which has a high xmax value. I have a low score in my current setup, which is 8.3 net with only 130cuin of port tuned at 33hz. I am completely flat from 30hz to 50hz. After 50hz it begins to slightly lose output, but anything below 30hz I have a really big dip in output. I ask these questions becuase almost every program I've used, suggests that I use at least 180cuin of port. Which is far more than what I have. And I believe that the programs are correct because right now I don't believe I am reaching max xmax. Which is crazy because of how much power I am applying (5500 watts). So, this all ties in because, as stated above, my theory is that I have too little port area combined with the power I am utilizing. I am "assuming", that thet too little port area combined with high power is causing me to "choke" the air that is being displaced. Or in other terms, I have too much water pressure to get through the water hose. Can you give an example of what you're saying?ockquote>Don't need to, your on the right track having a larger enclosure is more efficient and also opening up the port will help release more pressure from the enclosure helping you get Max excursion easier. You do have to be careful with how much you do open the port with your enclosure being as large as it is though so you don't run into mechanical issues. At 180in. Sq I think you'll be just fine and should net you some great gains. > No, larger ports do not allow the driver to hit xmax easier. Top pic 2'' port. Bottom pic 6'' port. The top lines in both graphs are group delays and the bottom lines are excursion at each power lever. Very clear no noticeable difference in xmax. Again only slight ripple shift due to FS change. Come on guys this book is only like 30 bucks shipped to your door. I understand what your saying, but science doesn't agree. Make an enclosure with a stupid large port and watch what the subwoofer does, then make the exact same enclosure and make the port area really small and again watch the subwoofer. They will react differently in the same enclosure with same tuning, but having a port opening on opposite ends of the spectrum I'm assuming you are saying the one with the small port will move more cause I believe that's what I'm gathering from what's being said. subwoofer in enclosure with small port will be less likely to "unload"

Most of the information above was in taken from my SSA Evil. Which has a high xmax value. I have a low score in my current setup, which is 8.3 net with only 130cuin of port tuned at 33hz. I am completely flat from 30hz to 50hz. After 50hz it begins to slightly lose output, but anything below 30hz I have a really big dip in output. I ask these questions becuase almost every program I've used, suggests that I use at least 180cuin of port. Which is far more than what I have. And I believe that the programs are correct because right now I don't believe I am reaching max xmax. Which is crazy because of how much power I am applying (5500 watts). So, this all ties in because, as stated above, my theory is that I have too little port area combined with the power I am utilizing. I am "assuming", that thet too little port area combined with high power is causing me to "choke" the air that is being displaced. Or in other terms, I have too much water pressure to get through the water hose. Can you give an example of what you're saying?Don't need to, your on the right track having a larger enclosure is more efficient and also opening up the port will help release more pressure from the enclosure helping you get Max excursion easier. You do have to be careful with how much you do open the port with your enclosure being as large as it is though so you don't run into mechanical issues. At 180in. Sq I think you'll be just fine and should net you some great gains. No, larger ports do not allow the driver to hit xmax easier. Top pic 2'' port. Bottom pic 6'' port. The top lines in both graphs are group delays and the bottom lines are excursion at each power lever. Very clear no noticeable difference in xmax. Again only slight ripple shift due to FS change. Come on guys this book is only like 30 bucks shipped to your door. I understand what your saying, but science doesn't agree. Make an enclosure with a stupid large port and watch what the subwoofer does, then make the exact same enclosure and make the port area really small and again watch the subwoofer. They will react differently in the same enclosure with same tuning, but having a port opening on opposite ends of the spectrum

Most of the information above was in taken from my SSA Evil. Which has a high xmax value. I have a low score in my current setup, which is 8.3 net with only 130cuin of port tuned at 33hz. I am completely flat from 30hz to 50hz. After 50hz it begins to slightly lose output, but anything below 30hz I have a really big dip in output. I ask these questions becuase almost every program I've used, suggests that I use at least 180cuin of port. Which is far more than what I have. And I believe that the programs are correct because right now I don't believe I am reaching max xmax. Which is crazy because of how much power I am applying (5500 watts). So, this all ties in because, as stated above, my theory is that I have too little port area combined with the power I am utilizing. I am "assuming", that thet too little port area combined with high power is causing me to "choke" the air that is being displaced. Or in other terms, I have too much water pressure to get through the water hose. Can you give an example of what you're saying? Don't need to, your on the right track having a larger enclosure is more efficient and also opening up the port will help release more pressure from the enclosure helping you get Max excursion easier. You do have to be careful with how much you do open the port with your enclosure being as large as it is though so you don't run into mechanical issues. At 180in. Sq I think you'll be just fine and should net you some great gains.

i hear what your saying. i had this arguement last year with somebody. by making your port area on the small side you WILL have more bandwidth than with more port area because of the compression that's happening.

Nice vid Mark! Do you have the unedited vids you can show also?

Do I see carbon fiber cones in the background? New project for the future?

Yeah, mid 90's they were pretty good

I've always found it better to face them down, but make sure you give a couple inches of room.

Looks like a super fun sex swing!

Why is everything that's so good just so frickin bad for you. Ouch my head hurts this morning!

He was just looking for a free bed, 3 meals a day, and free cable TV. No one is THAT stupid. I don't know why more homeless people dont do this. I just think that we should start cutting thieves hands off then I'm sure we would see a lot less of this

Lol maybe after a case of beer

home made blow jobbies? Think it would work????

duct tape and vacuum hose ftw!

I have to agree with Sean on this one

I tried to bother stefan on fb, but I guess he doesn't like random drunken music videos

how about the NS6.5-cs components Jacob? and do you have pricing on these?