KyleBrown

Going through I don't think they meant you were bashing the company/nick but others. I don't see how they're being sarcastic. Impious, tirefryr and shizzzon were trying to explain. M5 was the only one being sarcastic and was only doing it because tenacious is annoying and ignorant. I don't understand why you guys don't listen to these guys... Zero tact and constantly talking in circles rather than being direct. Discredits whatever they see fit without truly explaining why everyone else should discredit. They act as though they're %100 right, but fail to fully disclose why they are correct and someone else is incorrect. They scream tolerances and calibrations yet never give any real numbers. They never ask what the given tools tolerances are and if they have been calibrated or when the last time they were calibrated. Just because you have technical training behind you and some real world exercise, doesn't mean you have the right to discredit everyone else. It's easy to sit behind a computer and seem all so intelligent. There's a common factor of why a lot of people don't like this forum.

The vega is about the only woofer you listed that resembles any form is the vega, but that's my opinion. Oh and where's the damn pics?

I'm glad the beats comment was a joke lol. I can't stand those....

Yeap, I have no idea what's going on. I'm completely clueless. By no means have I been bashing or soiling Nick or IA's rep. I have no reason to that. Maybe you guys forget what they've done for me. I haven't. No one has answered my questions yet but I knew that would happen. It's always a dick measuring contest. Who can be the better sarcastic prick! Soup sandwich.

More useless information and talking in circles. Had there been no validity to the test, I doubt Nick would have responded in person on facebook and CACO. At the same time, it shows Nick truly cares about his product wants to further investigate it. Had this test been complete bull shit, would he have bothered with it? I don't think so. So there's good and bad coming from this test.

Sounds like you're staying on top of everything Shizz. I love the power that 4ch is putting out. That could really help guys with tight installs.

Since everything was done wrong even though none of claim to have read the review, please enlighten us as to what he did wrong? .9 volts is not going to net you another 2k+ Like I said, I'll wait for the retest.

It wasn't just a "clamp test" There was a "clamp test" done. Taylor has a new scope on the way and will retest. There's very few people whom I would trust in the car audio world, but Taylor is one of them. I've seen his amp test setup. It's not a red neck garage. Hopefully the retest will reveal some better results. The NS-1 didn't do so well either, but it's also designed as a high voltage amp.

I'd like to see these on some ti baskets with some sexy 10" spiders.

sweetness

das powa!

Nice pics

That's not very nice.

ehhh, I'll try.

The neo motor is called the warden. The last two generations of DP's have been segmented ferrite. No neo.

None of the DP models are neo. They a segmented ferrite.

Well the night started rough so we finished it off with some hammer time. I don't like how the slow motion on youtube degraded the sound and picture quality. Slow motion from my phone.

If my memory serves me right, those amps popped from too much input voltage.

Definitely tuned in, thank you for your time Tony.

Flat response won't be realistic. You're buying a sub with a massive amount of motor force, so peaky will be part of the game. You can try modeling them, but the plot is going to change once once those spiders break in. Most any sub will "play" music. How natural and how flat it will play is a different game. You'll never know until you try. I'm sure you'll be happy with the turn out.

Lookin nasty!

You're looking at close to double the power....

Which one is bigger? Get two 15s?

You know you can turn your phone the other way