Aaron Clinton

if you have it in your iTunes, that would be perfect because that is where it is going for me Yep, I do, but how do you get it? Burned CD? LMK. if you have the files, you can transfer them or email them, if you do not know the location of the music file, just click on the song in iTunes, and hit Ctrl + I and it will pop a window up with the location of the file on your computer, I love iTunes I'll e-mail them this afternoon when I get home, have an address? denim1 @ gmail.com

welcome to SSA, if you want to call powerbass the number is 909-993-5389

found this pic for you

I should change the title of the thread to: "I am dissapointed in the output of my RL-p because I did not build the box right and now someone else has my really nice subs and has them in a good box and loves them"

that is a tough question, both are capable amplifers, the XA 3000D would end the discussion

haha it was killing my trunk hatch in that 2.0 and it was tuned a little low (27hz) so I wonder how it would do if I had the time to put 800 watts on it and tune it up towards 35hz

he is a long time buddy of mine, and is part of the mod team with me at fordexplorer.net he probably is the most skilled computer person I know, and keep in mind I have 2 CIS degrees and keep up with the industry as much as I can

that is a feature that US AMPS has that I don't like

I feel the RL-ps will get louder, but I like the ID's for sure, for the price (just like Ryan said) are a great bargin for their performance, I have not heard head to head but the RL-p should have the Edge in SQ, but not by a great deal, honestly either set up is going to great, the ID's will be tight and accurate, and the RL-ps should hit the lower freq's a little stronger with smooth SQ, the direct comparo IDv3 vs RL-p is no match, the RL-p is much closer to IDMAX in performance IMO, both are going to be nice, but power requirements will be different

talk to bumpinyota, he did some awesome numbers last year with 4 L7 12's, if you are not competing, you could run 4 10's or 4 8's if you feel you need to run 4 subs, if not a pair of 12's can get nasty for daily needs, honestly you could run a single KX 1200 to a pair and shake the crap out of the truck, if you want to push them harder, get a second one, I will always choose the KX 1200 over the BX 1605D

I would be very interested in this project

oh and, what about the L2200? are they going to stay in the line up or is there going to be a larger 2 channel?

I don't see this being a problem with the CEA standards. If they are going to list the output and voltages, they should include current consumption and efficiency. This can be simply calculated if need be, but why not list typical consumption with music and sines. To me, that would just be an added bonus and attract me more to that particular brand to know that they took the time and effort to go above and beyond. I agree, I think it would help some companies and hurt others, example US AMPs are top of the heap for quality and power, but effiency is not their strong suit, where as another company could be completely oppsite

I hope he has a good b-day, just talked to him on the phone and I am sure he might not get the chance to stop by, but I am going to post this anyway

if you have it in your iTunes, that would be perfect because that is where it is going for me Yep, I do, but how do you get it? Burned CD? LMK. if you have the files, you can transfer them or email them, if you do not know the location of the music file, just click on the song in iTunes, and hit Ctrl + I and it will pop a window up with the location of the file on your computer, I love iTunes

We should have our east coast meet at one. :partybanana:

looks like a great project

if you have it in your iTunes, that would be perfect because that is where it is going for me

I dont have any of ^^^ in digital format

can't wait for the pix, side note have you tried the PB PR's?

is it a T or G? maybe H? if so, lets see some pictures