Aaron Clinton

nope not at all, just some of the guys who love the site have the banner up on other sites

the SE's are good subs, but not in the same league as the RL-p even if they were the same size

welcome to the site, and jamie is right, the 2 12's will do it

i'll do a 1.75 cube box and let you guys know how it sounds... thanks for the help... ~Kris take some pix

I have not owned one, but there are a few around that have messed with them

that is pretty funny, must have over heated his NOS

my pup, when riding shot gun, can add up to 2db when using the old TL, outlaw of course

mine is unpainted

great pix, well built amps, love em

there are a bunch of RL=p D2 12's for sale around you could nab for a great price

the specs of the design, lend it to be a ported box sub

thats the thing, i had the gain pretty low (never got around to doing the proper method ) so i'd guess it was closer to 600-700 and then theres the Imp rise... IMO, 3 cubes is way too big, especially with 1200w-1300w i would either do a 2 cube box and put in slugs to drop it down to where you want it or just a 1.75 cube box your not the first person to mention a weak spot in SX's bottom end, which is not bad for a SPL focused sub

open it when you are not running much other stuff, I have a gig and it took a while to get everything loaded, all other programs were slow because of all the pix

Tom, I think 900 is plenty to get a good bottom end, if not that would be strange

there are limits, but with in reason, the RL-p is a ported box driver and 2.0 seems to have been a sweet spot, unless you want to try to go larger

it seems that people have been more happy with the output at 2.0 and greater,

what are you going to power with them? if you say mags I am going to be sad because I cannot afford to do it yet

can't wait to see them

can you feel the love?

birthsheets are always fun

I am sure we might need more, there are people still asking about them

mine just showed up too

Click me