///M5

Simple ported. What amp/power requirements?

Are you related to Euclid? HBD!!

Thanks Neal. Still working on a potential reality for what you do, but it hasn't been a focus. I have three guys trying to work out a solution for the same measurements basically, but in Nuclear plants which of course in particular right now have some serious focus on insuring there are no surprises. If we ever get something worked out that is an effective package that we try someplace, I'll let you know. Perhaps can even use it as an excuse to visit

TOP

mezcal is disgusting, never had sotol

No such thing. ? Margaritas are really the only "mixed" drink I currently consume. Fuckin' yummy. And outside of that there are plenty of sipping tequila's that are good as well.

All the other frequencies will be covered. He just wants more bass to the picture. How low, how high? IE, movies or only music and does he care what the mids sound like or what extension?

ROFL. I will add though for a budget build that could actually work out in this case. IF the driver is chosen appropriately as it solves the need to have any processing and allows the use of a dumb, cheap pro audio amplifier.

More seriously though, for what frequency range (ie just music or...)

Horn?

boxToppers

But I guess that isn't really a box

IB

Oh shit.

What knowledge do you need? Put in the cd and turn up the gain till the device shows a red light.(so not really "knowledge") Like i said a 5 year old could do it without having to read manuals that are longer then a page... It doesn't work that way, you have to play a sine tone. They cannot build one that is accurate that works with a CD for an anywhere near reasonable amount of money. This of course means that the target market of the noobs will still screw it up and again, it won't help them anyways.

Well its my parents, but yeah What? I wasn't listening.

Hey wait, CONGRATS on the house

And you CAN get a much better finish than that poster does even with rather mundane equipment.

You should tell him, FUCKER, I want real meat. Figured you'd say that lol. It's gotta be better then my last weeks worth of meals, mcdonalds, inn n out, and microwavables Crap, in that case ENJOY!! Sorry that I made them less appealing....in return, let me help make them more appealing. HAF has a cooking corner that will allow you to ask any question regarding food preparation and if you post, I'll pay extra attention to it

You should tell him, FUCKER, I want real meat.

Couldn't agree more as long as the box includes the compensation for the environment, which I will assume you were implying. That's subjective, and no I am not drawing or implying judgment on either driver. For you, I am sure your statement holds true. For the goal of show a number on the meter You'll have one hell of a conflicting test if you do that. Highest numbers you could determine, but it would surely be easier to make a model and validate it than to try and create a model out of an experiment. As for the most flexible and better, that is going to be a subjective determination unless you are silly enough to always consider better a higher number. *outside of competing for numbers of course*

Hell, I am WAY harder on me than anyone else.

And those were ALL done on a shitty stove/grill/whatever. Way too much differential between the crust and the rest of the meat. More time to room temp and a longer rest would probably help as well. Cook me a steak and ship it to me, keyboard Commando. Serious about steak though You'll have to eat it cold. <--never said I haven't fucked up a steak and yes, I am my own worst critic

Oh, and fatty burgers are still yummy RARE

Anything past medium is burnt, unless its a rather fatty burger (25%+ fat) The way they fucked that up that medium looks like a well to me. If it doesn't now, let it sit for 10 minutes and *pukes*