June 9, 201411 yr Author I have messaged Duran, no luck at all. Anyone else in the Salt Lake City, Utah area ?
June 10, 201411 yr Try kylar96 he's in Layton area I believe. I live in slc but I'm no good at design atm. Been learning some stuff from loudspeaker design cookbook and the interwebz tho.
June 11, 201411 yr Author Guess I've decided on DC Level 2 10's for subs ... Most likely the amp will be a Sundown 1000D.
June 12, 201411 yr I can see what I can come up with to see what everyone thinks about it with a cutlist. Edited June 12, 201411 yr by bulldogfreddy
June 12, 201411 yr Author I can see what I can come up with to see what everyone thinks about it with a cutlist.I would appreciate it.
June 12, 201411 yr http://store.soundsolutionsaudio.com/2007-2013-gmc-sierra-and-chevrolet-silverado-extended-cab-dual-ported-sub-box/ I was thinking about this, but 1.4 total is not big enough for what I'm wanting in a ported box. I've heard of people getting almost 2.5 cu. ft under the seat. ROFL. No way with your budget. 2cuft GROSS is tough without fiberglass AND will require a seat lift. With your budget you don't have room for 2 10's ported. 2 10's sealed, 1 10 ported, 1 12 sealed is pretty much it. Your measurements also won't help a builder since there is a big ass hump in the middle of your box and you are going to need to lift the seat. There is a simple reason you don't yet have an answer and it is all due to the way you've asked. Don't get upset at people who have answered no matter what they've said since you've given them nothing to go on. There are other constraints on underseat boxes besides dimensions as well. Have to worry about pole vent clearance, excursion clearance, and funny loading if you are firing towards a hard surface.
June 13, 201411 yr Author I've found some help ... and I will get 2.5 cu. ft after port displacement with a 2" seat lift..
June 13, 201411 yr Beware, that is still gross... 2" lift isn't trivial either. Make sure they are doing it safely, if not you are better off removing the seat. Anything more than about 7/8" requires extra fabrication.
June 13, 201411 yr I've found some help ... and I will get 2.5 cu. ft after port displacement with a 2" seat lift..Have you actually figured it out with all measurement and everything or is that what someone said they can do for you?
June 14, 201411 yr Author I've found some help ... and I will get 2.5 cu. ft after port displacement with a 2" seat lift..Have you actually figured it out with all measurement and everything or is that what someone said they can do for you? Actually using a CAD program with some measurements from the truck. Program is crazy complicated, I couldn't run it. Think it's going to work out really well.
June 14, 201411 yr I've found some help ... and I will get 2.5 cu. ft after port displacement with a 2" seat lift..Have you actually figured it out with all measurement and everything or is that what someone said they can do for you? Actually using a CAD program with some measurements from the truck. Program is crazy complicated, I couldn't run it. Think it's going to work out really well.Is that 2.5 after sub. Port and enclosure thickness? Edited June 14, 201411 yr by frogcase2002
June 14, 201411 yr I've found some help ... and I will get 2.5 cu. ft after port displacement with a 2" seat lift.. Have you actually figured it out with all measurement and everything or is that what someone said they can do for you? Actually using a CAD program with some measurements from the truck. Program is crazy complicated, I couldn't run it. Think it's going to work out really well.Measurements are harder than making the CAD Helps we own a 3D laser scanner...
June 14, 201411 yr Author I've found some help ... and I will get 2.5 cu. ft after port displacement with a 2" seat lift..Have you actually figured it out with all measurement and everything or is that what someone said they can do for you? Actually using a CAD program with some measurements from the truck. Program is crazy complicated, I couldn't run it. Think it's going to work out really well. Measurements are harder than making the CAD Helps we own a 3D laser scanner... 3D laser scanner is a good idea .. all the gruntwork is done already.
June 15, 201411 yr $85k is a bit prohibitive. I know there are cheaper options, but I hvaen't looked for them.
June 16, 201411 yr Author Decided on Focal 165KR2 6.5" compononents .. thinking about the Zapco ST-4x to power them. Any thoughts?
June 16, 201411 yr Have you listened to the Focal's? Love/hate relationship with most people on those. No one will really talk bad about Zapco.
June 16, 201411 yr Author I did listen to the Focals. It was a toss up between the Focals and Hybrid Audio. Was basically a coin flip. I just thought the Focal's looked cooler so I went with them. Edited June 16, 201411 yr by cehmke
June 16, 201411 yr Author I didn't think so at all. I was disappointed with DD & ARC components, I really expected more from both. I still think MB Quarts are the best bang for the buck components out there.. to my ear anyways.
June 22, 201411 yr Author Opinions on 1200-1500 watt mono amps ? I've had good luck with Precision Power and Hifonics in the past ..
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.