did I just catch up on this forum!!!???

OOOH snaps!

I'm glad crunch time here is over althoguht I would rather be insanely busy than have down time. Sucks comming back to mountains of other things while changing 2 integral software systems and possibly a third comming up.

TOO MUCH TO DO!!

I am liking that it's not letting me be lazy. However I may have to redo all the electrical on the rental.

thank god it's family who lives there and I can do it slow.... then again I would have a good deal extra rent... then again I would have to pay taxes rather than just charge him utes plus a bit more for repairs...

then again.....

you could use a verry subtle tint to the lens?

It would cost some lumens, but might be worth it. You never know untill it's in practice and in use.

Yeah, that's a good idea !

Either way...I need to order 20 leds and 30-40 lens and make a prototype..

Tempted to get a pair of SLS 6.5s...there's somebody selling a pair locally...

You mean SLS 6.3 aye em jeez?

I could use a pair of those.

His and his.

Gull wing TOP

You mean SLS 6.3 aye em jeez?

I could use a pair of those.

Fo sho, I'd use them as a ramp, they'd be cheaper than a lift

bottom !

Tempted to get a pair of SLS 6.5s...there's somebody selling a pair locally...

I was thinking about those bitches to replace my quad RS180s, but then I'd have to buy mids and I like the 2-way.

laZy day

Sean this is for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0AlcVU-de4

^hehe

got my last cup of earl gray tea

Sean this is for you.

Ha, roughly the same size? The M5 has WAY more driver space. IE I fit versus feeling like a very big man in a small car.

If you drive both, you'll hate the CTS-V in comparison. Feels like a Japanese piece of shit. And yes I have driven both on the same day.

Amusingly, I drove another M5 this week. And also amusingly I CAN lease an M5 for work as it fits my pricing requirements, but the CTS-V does not. Exclusively because of course they are all too new and I need an 07 M5 to make it work.

Perhaps you should compare a 2006 M5 and 2006 CTS-V, then do the same for 2012. Of course that wouldn't fit C&D's prerogative, but it would prove the point.

One other thing. 4.0/4.1 you aren't going to notice, the difference in the quarter you won't notice, but where you will is from 30-100mph. Guess which car wins there? Also curious they tested an M5 manual when everyone who has one knows the SMG is king.

CTS-V has come a long way...but you drive both and if the M5 is $90k you think the CTS is worth $50k at WAY most.

Funny how terrible car reviews are. Would I complain if I "had" to drive either? No. Other than when the GM plasti-shit started breaking which it will.

Just saw your note that it was for me *blushes*

The problem with both is that when you are 6'7" a baby seat won't fit behind you in either. In the caddy no one can sit behind me, in the BM'er a midget could.

TOP

Too bad that midgets take less room than babies

I got an interview with Union Pacific, hell ya!

GOOD LUCK!