Someone wanna come down to KS/MO and help me build a wall if i can't do the box in the trunk?

You can't wall that thing.

Put a couple 10s in the trunk and be done with it.

Someone wanna come down to KS/MO and help me build a wall if i can't do the box in the trunk?

You can't wall that thing.

Haha I know you like stangs

Half wall?

Save the rest of the money for a turbo kit.

Save the rest of the money for a turbo kit.

They're not cheap checked out procharger and STS

Running something like 5 grand.

5k for sts. That's absolute nonsense.

Something like that.

Save the rest of the money for a turbo kit.

I like that idea

Aren't superchargers usually cheaper? That was the case for my friends Si Civic. It was about 2k for a SC and 5k or so for turbo.

Not for a braaaaand new car.

Could always start with the prerequisites for forced induction. It would gain you some HP and provide a platform to build on if you ever go that route.

I'm not huge in to fast cars, gets me in trouble.

So much more fun than bass, and chicks like fast cars more than they like bass. I've never had a chick's panties get wet from the bass, but they did from the speed and twisties.

You're awesome Ryan

I pucking hate accounting.

It filtered that one

Duran, don't you have an Alpine 9887? You wouldn't happen to know if iPod Classics are compatible with them would you? The 120GB to be specific.

I would imagine it is, I use a new Nano with mine, its new enough that it won't change, but it plays.

So much more fun than bass, and chicks like fast cars more than they like bass. I've never had a chick's panties get wet from the bass, but they did from the speed and twisties.

Luckally my cars just fast enough to do that

and my girl loves bass

Ok, that's reassuring. I searched it on Google and didn't find anything definite. If it's compatible with a new nano then it should handle a Classic from '09.

At the beginning of the video, he states that "Piers Morgan called me a bigot. Because I believe what the Catholic church teaches with respect to homosexuality, I'm a bigot. So now I'm a bigot, because I believe what the Bible teaches. Now, that 2000 years of teaching and moral theology is now bigoted." Apparently he doesn't like to be called a bigot. Merriam-Webster defines it as:

big·ot

noun \ˈbi-gət\

Definition of BIGOT

: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

— big·ot·ed adjective

— big·ot·ed·ly adverb

So yes, even though he doesn't like to be referred to as a bigot, or the Catholic church to be labeled as such, they in fact are. Sorry, 2000 years of teaching and moral theology can't change the fact that treating homosexuals with hatred and/or intolerance is bigotry.

Strike 1.

At 0:45 he states that legally allowing homosexual marriage will "...it will undermine the family. It will destroy faith in America...and will anybody go out there and make the argument as to why this is a good thing because it will happen. Make the argument why this is right."

He's running to be the President of the United States. Whether or not anybody likes to admit it, the USA is a secular nation. Faith and religion should not play any part in electing the Chief Executive. Also, the student, while a bit arrogant, is correct in referencing the studies and court documents presented by the American Psychological Association, Canadian Psychological Association, and Australian Psychological Association that "make the argument why this is right."

Strike 2.

After scoffing at the student's rebuttal, he rebukes the validity of the APA, as well as the AMA at 2:12 when he states that "An organization supporting a position is not evidence". Uh, really? See Strike 1.

Strike 3.

Yup, he's definitely a douche.

As to your original question:

I personally don't think they should be married either, but I don't believe in marriage at all, so if I were to go voice my opinion as he does, or anyone else for that matter, does that make me a douche?

Only if you're seeking election to a public office. Someone on a message board or some random guy on the street? Just another random asshole. Nothing wrong with being either, mind you. I certainly enjoy being both.

word

I'm brushing off the fact he used argumentum ad antiquitatem as the crux of his position because all politicians (and marketing firms, to be fair) are guilty of using logical fallacy at one point or another.

Sorry, have to use it

:roflmao:

also, the short version of my argument

:roflmao: