Posted July 22, 201213 yr I have been looking at Builds trying to plan a box for 4 18" mayhems but I noticed that Steve has a tiny port for his 4 18"s in his Tahoe. how is it possible that he hits so hard with a small port? could I use a box like this and get the same results?
July 22, 201213 yr He's really all not that loud for what he has.. lol...I wouldn't want the same results as him.
July 22, 201213 yr Author I Don't really have enough Room for that much port area. would it be better to have 4 15"s with the right amount of port area or 4 18"s with a port like steves?
July 22, 201213 yr Ok, I'm going to help you out a little bit here.1: STOP comparing your system to SMD's ok. Once you have done that, then progress will begin to happen. I promise.
July 22, 201213 yr I Don't really have enough Room for that much port area. would it be better to have 4 15"s with the right amount of port area or 4 18"s with a port like steves?Then scrap the idea of 4 18's then. Me personally, I'll be damned if I pay for 4 18's and then not even use them to their full potential. That's a waste of money. If you want them just to say "I have 4 18's" then sure, we can't change your mind. If you want the most effective use of your equipment you will plan for something smaller.
July 22, 201213 yr Author my goals are to have a daily system that will kill the lows. but I will also want to get past 55:) I don't exactly how much space I have but it will be going in a Tahoe. I will have about 3k rms per sub. how would the sp4 18" do sealed?
July 22, 201213 yr my goals are to have a daily system that will kill the lows. but I will also want to get past 55:) I don't exactly how much space I have but it will be going in a Tahoe. I will have about 3k rms per sub. how would the sp4 18" do sealed?IDK (about the SP4's) but I'd bet 4 15's ported in an optimal enclosure would perform equally if not better for less money.
July 23, 201213 yr here is a scenario i had in my car so you be the judge of 4 15s vs 4 18s.Remember, i only had 2 batteries and stock alt so my db numbers are low because of that.4 15s1082A of current draw144sqin of port(very small)13.5cuft NET volume153.4db at headrest3 15s781A of current draw280sqin of port12.5cuft NET volume153.4db at headrestSo let's evaluate-both setups equal same score, exactly..So, i dropped 1 sub (177sqin of cone area) and increased port area by 135sqin = 280sqin of port.I then also increased volume per driver from 3.375 to 4.16cuftBUT.. i cut output power from 1082A to only 781A.Summary-more cone area, less volume, more power = less cone area, bigger volume, less power.In your situation, your power will be the same.In my 4 15 install, i was only using 11sqin of port per cube in a sense.the 3 15 install was using 22.4sqin of port per cube.Doubling the port area and decreasing power usage by only 28% and decreasing cone area by 25% netted same output.You be the judge.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.