lee
SSA Regular
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by lee
-
sweet lookin little subs. i love tens
-
I certainly hope no one took my post serious
-
-
-
-
I hope so, lol.. that would be so ass-backwards, lol.. Might as well have some TSNS subs in there, haha... Nicks favorite
-
Looks good
-
brand of dmm? coil have any discoloration? tinsel leads make solid connection or look frayed?
-
awesome amp. i had a charcoal 2300F that did me well at a comp in 99
good stuff,...but where's the SPL?
neat lil amp. would be something id use in the wifes rig
nick must hate it. it has those amps he dis-likes SO much
i want
Ive been using Fi subs exclusively since 2007... doubt i would qualify
i clicked thinking it was guna do 10" excursion/throw . nice either way
spades are the worst imo. especially the ones with the un-even sized spades { i.e. wide and narrow }. short of soldering , they're the worst termination just one of my pet peaves.
i hate spade terminals so bad. id rather see direct leads then spades. even on a 6.5 no joke i can see a possible clearance issue though. did i mention i hate spade terminals...
people just don't understand this concept. it's quite annoying seeing the "dcr" figure getting thrown around like it's the nominal impedance. perfect example is with Fi. look at their site, click on any model sub category, and at the top it says either dual1, or dual2 ohm coils. but 2 lines down would you look at that....the "RE" aka "DCR" figure .7 [d1] and 1.4 [d2]. i wish people would realize that the "nominal impedance" has been the figure for matching speakers to amplifiers since the beginning. i blame the consumers paying too much attention to what competitors are doing in the lanes, vs just using whats been the standard all in all, i giggle a little every time i see someone say " im running my amp at .7 daily " not knowing full well that's just a 1ohm nominal impedance load. there are however a few manufactures using some oddball coil figures, but for those that know the difference or not is another story