In the interest in trying to do as Sean (///M5) had told me I needed to do in my ON/OFF Axis thread I've been playing around with everything. I've been going through crossover and EQ settings on the components in the van, I've spent time playing with the components in the Jimmy (I can't drive it, may as well work on the audio, right?), and I've also been slowly buying up some other stuff to play with. I bought the Dayton RS180-4 mids from Ricksi, I bought a pair of Aura NS3 3", a pair of Fountek FE85 3", and a pair of FaitalPRO 3FE25 3" full rangers all for the sake of trying to train my ear and learn what problems and anomalies can and are occurring in the hunt to get the sound I'm looking for. I have to say that aside from an awful lack of midbass the components in the van are pretty much what I'm looking for. Even running passive they don't have any issues with breakup, overbearing on any particular frequency and aside from the loudness setting turned on on the HU the EQ is dead flat. They're actually fairly impressive speakers for the money I paid and the fact they've lasted as long as they have taking the beating they have I've more than gotten my money's worth out of them. Even with the loudness off the only real problem I hear is the midrange being a little more in my face than I prefer to hear, of course that makes sense being that the loudness setting boosts a little on the bass and treble ends of the spectrum thus quieting the midrange down some. I can't find any real benefit doing anything else with the EQ besides that. I've had to come to grips with the fact that the less than stellar job I did installing the baffles for the components is the most likely culprit for their lack of midbass. There's not enough breathing room around the large motor's on them to allow them to work right. Without doing some careful work I'll have the same problem with the woofers in the Bravox CS603CF's when/if I ever get around to putting them in. Aside from that I think the limited number of people who've heard the van would agree the highs are as clear and even sounding as anyone could ask for with fairly good stage and imaging. All that amounts to is that I got really lucky with it and that luck didn't follow me into the Jimmy. Well, that's enough of that mess. The point of the thread is to share my opinions on as I make my journey through testing and playing with all this stuff. Hopefully those thoughts and opinions and discussion on the topic can help others as well. I'm going to start by setting up the current components in the Jimmy in an active setup. I'm going to get the Solid 2 installed and wired up to the tweeters and set the crossovers on the Clarion accordingly to see what kind of difference that makes with the set. A little preliminary testing (mids hooked up without passives) shows that it may be a promising move. Once all possible scenarios with that set have been exhausted I'll be testing with every combination of speakers and settings. Another thing Sean said was to never buy a set of speakers and expect it to be the last ones a person buys. I'm slowly getting an arsenal of drivers amassed so as to figure out what combination of what configuration I like best and I figure the more options I have, well the longer it will take (this is fun stuff!!) and the more I can learn from and grow from the experience. Here's the full rangers. I already had in my possession some Tang Band 3" full range speakers from a Logitech Z-560 (580, 680, something like that, the 400+ watt 4.1 set) computer speaker set that blew the amp out many years ago. I'm using the enclosures from them for all four sets to do the testing with so I don't have to build any. The size and configuration isn't perfect for all of them but at least it lets me test them in an enclosure of some kind. I have to say from initial testing the Faital's are leading the pack. They're super smooth and seem to extend way farther up in frequency than the others though the low end sounds kinda hollow. I assume that's from the super flat impedance curve that's published for them. Second is the Fountek's as they seem to have the most realistic sound, but they don't sparkle on the high end much and the low end is pretty hollow sounding as well. Third in line is the Aura's with a surprisingly rich lower end but they have a very tame sounding midrange and high end. They don't sound bad, but they're not quite out there and realistic as the other two. I still have to get the solder off the terminals on the TB's before I can make any sort of comparison with the others. I listened to them for years and thought they were great but who knows what kinds of built in EQing, crossovers, etc. Logitech had built into the amp for them and it's been years since I've heard them so I don't think it's even remotely possible to comment on them from memory and in that context. Here's a couple of pics just for fun. The Fountek's in the enclosures with the Aura's and Faital's sitting next to them. I just had them hooked up to a cheap little Lepai amp that I had lying around connected to my iPhone. It's not great, but it works. I plugged the ports on those little enclosure's to attempt to make the playing field just a tad more level. I'll get a little more industrious about it when I can get a bit more serious about the testing. I did have them the same height, angles, etc. on axis while testing as well.