Posted May 16, 201114 yr If a member has an excessive negative reputation rating then that member should be banned. Lets keep this site clean and throw out the trash!Here is an example SSA FORUM MEMBER WITH A REP RATING OF -104Does everybody agree? Edited May 16, 201114 yr by edouble101
May 16, 201114 yr If a member has an excessive negative reputation rating then that member should be banned. Lets keep this site clean and throw out the trash!Here is an example SSA FORUM MEMBER WITH A REP RATING OF -104Does everybody agree?Nope. Because that opens up a huuuuuuge can of worms. What you propose means that if I don't like what someone is saying, I can -1 them, and get a bunch of other people to -1 them until they're gone. That's gay. As long as they stay within the rules they should be able to stay, regardless of whether or not you like the things they say."Arrrg that guy edouble is a douche, -1 every thing he posts" and then a few weeks and you're gone. Sound like a good idea?
May 16, 201114 yr If a member has an excessive negative reputation rating then that member should be banned. Lets keep this site clean and throw out the trash!Here is an example SSA FORUM MEMBER WITH A REP RATING OF -104Does everybody agree?Nope. Because that opens up a huuuuuuge can of worms. What you propose means that if I don't like what someone is saying, I can -1 them, and get a bunch of other people to -1 them until they're gone. That's gay. As long as they stay within the rules they should be able to stay, regardless of whether or not you like the things they say."Arrrg that guy edouble is a douche, -1 every thing he posts" and then a few weeks and you're gone. Sound like a good idea?^^^ This. Now if they don't follow the rules consistently, ban them.
May 16, 201114 yr 'stealth' just came back from a vacation, he was banned for several reasons, none of which need to be discussed here. Banning members with negative members cannot be done due to the fact that they are not manageable, meaning that function is either on, or off.
May 16, 201114 yr Author Ah I see.Sounds like a cap should be implemented to prevent one member from solely giving negative or positive reps to another member more than "x" amount of times.
May 16, 201114 yr Ah I see.Sounds like a cap should be implemented to prevent one member from solely giving negative or positive reps to another member more than "x" amount of times.It's limited to one per post, that's about all.
May 29, 201114 yr Admin Stealth was banned for a while, have not banned anyone in ages. Anyway, he explained to me that if he could come back he would chill out. So I am extending the benefit of the doubt conditionally.
May 31, 201114 yr Stealth was banned for a while, have not banned anyone in ages. Anyway, he explained to me that if he could come back he would chill out. So I am extending the benefit of the doubt conditionally.I have no idea what he was banned for either and I think most (or some) knew that me and him didn't co-exist the best on the forum, but I believe this to be a good idea. Everyone deserves a second chance and quite honestly the guy did seem to try hard to help people who were asking questions for help. Whether or not the info he was giving was right or wrong I can't remember, but I believe it to be noble of you to allow him back.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.