Leaderboard

Then change your box if you are not happy with it. I'm sure it is incorrect.

I'd start over for sure, nothing but crap in that setup. A really retro receiver from a pawn shop/CL will kill it. Then you can add whatever you like for the two speakers and sub.

I don't think you will find one at the SSA store. The 3500 has taken it's place.

No..can't. If amplifier is running wide open at 2000 watts...sine wave, it is making 200 volts and 10 amps. That is all it will make...that is all the power supply will support, that is all the gates on the fets will switch. Flip the generator over to square wave, by definition in this thread it should have less power...according to RMS calculations done. It was already making maximum power before with the sine wave. There is FAR more heat present...we stuck the fluke probe right to the coil. It was around 130 degrees hotter if memory serves me correctly right after turning the amp off..that is absolute fact. It was hotter. Period. If 2000 watts is 2000 watts...and there is no difference according to a speaker with a square wave form vs a sine wave form..why was there 130 degrees more heat? The amp didn't suddenly make 4000 watts to get it the 130 degrees hotter. The only thing that changed was the wave form, and the time period that it was on...100%. Instead of .707 RMS of a sine wave..because RMS and Peak is the same within a square wave form..

You don't even understand the test. And now you are just making shit up, lol... If you had a clue, you would understand that I never said all waveforms were the same, quite the opposite really. This is why you, and most other people who arm chair quater back this are full of BS... You just make crap up out of gut feelings. But anyway, this is truly a dead horse... I am done beating it...