Welcome to the IHoP

[ramos 2]

Cause there's a few more items in there than just fosgate stuff

[///M5 2,833]

Ebay links suck. Have to go and seach for the Z220 and it pops up at the top.

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Aaron, your killing me or my wallet today.

The WCC is just an Orion right?  If you don't want that guy Ramos I might surely.

which amp?

[ramos 2]

Looks like a CB amplifier, lol

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Yeah , kind of does doesn't it . THat was cream o' the crop when most of you guys were but a mere twinkle in your parents eyes

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Z220 Zapco

That link won't work for me? Or maybe it's just eBay having a hissyfit...

search # 280015429554

[ramos 2]

Aaron, your killing me or my wallet today.

The WCC is just an Orion right?

[///M5 2,833]

Aaron, your killing me or my wallet today.

The WCC is just an Orion right?  If you don't want that guy Ramos I might surely.

which amp?

The WCC.

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

any pictures of that classic orion?

Don't know what that whitish looking reflection across the amp is in the picture....a glare or something from taking the pic I assume.

It's not actually present on the unit itself.

thats one of those pieces you just keep regarless if you use it or not

[///M5 2,833]

The Zapco I don't have a need for, but it might end up coming this way if the price stays right.

[Prowler573 0]

I'm still hunting some actual output numbers for that 222 SX, denim, if you happen to know them?

I know it's rated for 22w X 2 @ 4 Ohms but I was under the impression that the SX-series amps would run at a fairly low resistance and give much higher wattage levels than their 4 Ohm ratings would imply? (much like the original HCCA-series amps did)

I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong here but even if I am incorrect in my assumption it sounds good and for what I paid for it I can't really complain.

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Oh , Aaron looky what I got from another board yesterday. 

$40 shipped

I just saw a Halfner on ebay

[JimJ 11]

Must be crazy in here because the chithole is shut down...

[JimJ 11]

Not that I'm complaining.

[///M5 2,833]

Must be crazy in here because the chithole is shut down...

Jeez, your a quick one huh?

[///M5 2,833]

I think that is 3 today...

[Prowler573 0]

Must be crazy in here because the chithole is shut down...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Just now getting to that, T00b Phaerie?

[///M5 2,833]

My fav was the rip on Shanna though.

[Beat_Dominator 2]

T00bs melt your brain

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

I'm still hunting some actual output numbers for that 222 SX, denim, if you happen to know them?

I know it's rated for 22w X 2 @ 4 Ohms but I was under the impression that the SX-series amps would run at a fairly low resistance and give much higher wattage levels than their 4 Ohm ratings would imply? (much like the original HCCA-series amps did)

I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong here but even if I am incorrect in my assumption it sounds good and for what I paid for it I can't really complain.

I am rusty on my old old Orion, but I dont think the SX droped down as low as the HCCA's, but I would safely guess it would be closer to 45 x 2 @4ohms and maybe pushing the range of 160 x1 @4, but I could be a little off on my figures, little rusty like I said.

[JimJ 11]

Prowler - I hadn't checked it before asshat

Sean - I agree

[Prowler573 0]

T00bs melt your brain

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That must be my problem, too.

I have used more than my fair share of tube-driven 11-meter amplifiers back in the day...

[///M5 2,833]

I'm still hunting some actual output numbers for that 222 SX, denim, if you happen to know them?

I know it's rated for 22w X 2 @ 4 Ohms but I was under the impression that the SX-series amps would run at a fairly low resistance and give much higher wattage levels than their 4 Ohm ratings would imply? (much like the original HCCA-series amps did)

I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong here but even if I am incorrect in my assumption it sounds good and for what I paid for it I can't really complain.

I am rusty on my old old Orion, but I dont think the SX droped down as low as the HCCA's, but I would safely guess it would be closer to 45 x 2 @4ohms and maybe pushing the range of 160 x1 @4, but I could be a little off on my figures, little rusty like I said.

tweeter amp

[Aaron Clinton 2,372]

Must be crazy in here because the chithole is shut down...

lets hope it stays that way,

err I mean busy

[JimJ 11]

T00bs melt your brain

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That must be my problem, too.

I have used more than my fair share of tube-driven 11-meter amplifiers back in the day...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

i's gonna call de eff cee cee on yo ass...

wait a minute...

They could bust me too

[Prowler573 0]

I am rusty on my old old Orion, but I dont think the SX droped down as low as the HCCA's, but I would safely guess it would be closer to 45 x 2 @4ohms and maybe pushing the range of 160 x1 @4, but I could be a little off on my figures, little rusty like I said.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Well, just being what it is made it worth the $38/shipped I paid for it.

Not as good of a deal as that $40 Fosgate ramos just posted but a decent price nonetheless.