Negative ratings.

[pmureika 31]

I would like to see who is giving the negative or positive rating!

Not just letting a person vote without you being able to say something back to them!

Edited October 22, 2013 by pmureika

[Sencheezy 689]

Why? Would only cause more issues. Maybe to see like, but not dislike. Would cause a lot of drama.

[neo_styles 43]

No offense, but does anybody actually pay attention to that? Seems like it would only be necessary to have your opinion validated in which case a quote discussing said validation would be more than enough. I agree with Sencheezy that it ends up causing more drama than it's worth.

[pmureika 31]

Then do away with both.

My problem is somebody can go back and give negatives on anything you said.

Edited October 22, 2013 by pmureika

[///M5 2,833]

People negative me because they love me

[pmureika 31]

I give you positives because I like what what you say.

 

Not because I disagree with your opinion.

 

Some people take it personal and give negatives because they can!

[nigel 148]

Its the fact that people give negatives based on opinion of the poster not on the content of the post. As said previously ratings should have a reason that you can attach to the rating that people can look at.

[Impious 1,476]

Moved to OT

[SpeakerBoy 64]

I think negatives should be for bad advice, positives for helpful advice, and post your opinion if you have something in between. 

[Tirefryr 1,742]

The whole thing is gay.

[Quentin Jarrell 671]

Can be a little funny especially when Jon gets all hot and bothered and starts putting up drunken posts.

[pmureika 31]

I just think if your going to give a positive or negative rating that person should give a reason!

[Impious 1,476]

It's an Internet forum. How is your life affected if your post is neg'd? It's not.